August 23, 2022
SI v. BED BATH & BEYOND CORPORATION et al
Case Number:
1:22-cv-02541
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bronstein Gewirtz
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Cohen Milstein
- Davis Polk
- Kaplan Fox
- Pomerantz LLP
- Tannenbaum Helpern
- Vinson & Elkins
- Williams & Connolly
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 07, 2025
Bed Bath & Beyond Investors Can't Move Judge On Class Cert.
Bed Bath & Beyond shares did not trade on an efficient market during the class period, a Washington, D.C., federal judge confirmed again, refusing to reconsider his class certification denial in a suit from the now-bankrupt retailer's investors who alleged they were misled by company executives and a billionaire investor.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login