Wills, Trusts & Estates

  • April 25, 2025

    SCC rules CRTC has no jurisdiction to decide 5G access disputes between telecoms and municipalities

    In a decision that addresses the role of so-called “dynamic” statutory interpretation in cases where technology has evolved or other circumstances have changed significantly since a law was enacted, the Supreme Court of Canada has affirmed 7-2 that the CRTC does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes between telecom carriers and public authorities that have refused to allow the telcos to deploy 5G small cell antennas on public property.

  • April 23, 2025

    Call rights in shareholders’ agreements: Navigating the anti-deprivation rule

    The shareholders’ agreement governs the relationship among a corporation’s shareholders. It often establishes the rules governing the exit of a shareholder — for instance, by way of call right provisions upon the occurrence of certain triggering events.

  • April 17, 2025

    Personal autonomy: The right to decide when making controversial gifts

    In our aging society where many of us live well into our nineties, often with diminished capacity, the issue of autonomy to make gifts is of increasing importance.

  • April 15, 2025

    New CBA course aims to aid legal professionals in serving trans clients

    During one of the most hostile periods in recent history for trans rights, the Canadian Bar Association has launched an online course to help legal professionals better serve trans people.

  • April 15, 2025

    Spousal support and foreign divorces

    Family lawyers have all experienced the frustration of advising a spouse that our courts do not have jurisdiction, either under the Divorce Act or the Family Law Act, to grant spousal support if a valid divorce has been granted in a foreign jurisdiction.

  • April 14, 2025

    Limitless? When employees become disabled during the notice period

    In Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority Inc. v. Pasap, 2025 SKCA 15, the court considered the case of an employee who sued for both reasonable notice damages, as well as damages for lost disability insurance benefits, when he became disabled during his claimed notice period. The court of appeal, in its majority and dissenting reasons, demonstrates the tension around determining whether a worker is disabled from all occupations.

  • April 11, 2025

    Nova Scotia, legal group providing power of attorney app

    Nova Scotia has partnered with a legal resource provider to develop a free app aimed at making it easier to name a power of attorney.

  • April 10, 2025

    Constitutional clash brewing as Ottawa targets immigration bar with up to $1.5 million in admin penalties

    Bar organizations are warning Ottawa that a new administrative monetary penalty regime to be applied to legal professionals — featuring penalties of up to $1.5 million for immigration and refugee lawyers determined by federal officials to have participated in clients’ misrepresentations — will be constitutionally challenged if lawyers are not exempted from the proposed regulations, which are expected to come into force later this year.

  • April 09, 2025

    New $1 coin marks the creation of the Supreme Court of Canada 150 years ago

    The Supreme Court of Canada marked a milestone birthday on April 8, 2025, 150 years after it came into existence on April 8, 1875, when the Supreme and Exchequer Courts Act received royal assent. The composition, powers and importance of the world’s only bilingual and bijural apex court have evolved considerably since the court first sat in 1876, after the original six-judge bench was appointed.

  • April 09, 2025

    Suspicious circumstances need not be proven on balance of probabilities: Manitoba Appeal Court

    The doctrine of suspicious circumstances is not a new concept. Dating back to the English ecclesiastical courts before English law was adopted in Canada, typically suspicious circumstances were used to challenge the validity of wills. In recent years, however, a growing body of case law in Canada explores how suspicious circumstances can be applied in other contexts, resulting in a series of new decisions from the Manitoba Court of Appeal addressing the doctrine’s application to capacity to appoint an attorney for property (see Drewniak v. Smith, 2024 MBCA 86 and Henderson Estate (Re), 2024 MBCA 95) and capacity to enter a contract (see McLeod Estate v. Cole, 2022 MBCA 73).