Calif. Gets Pay-For-Delay Ban Partially Revived

By Bryan Koenig · February 16, 2022, 6:09 PM EST

A California federal judge on Tuesday partially reinstated the Golden State's ban on most so-called pay-for-delay deals by permitting the prohibition on deals struck within the state but not on those...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Order

Case Information

Case Title

Assoc. for Accessible Medicines v. Becerra

Case Number

Court

California Eastern

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Other

Date Filed

August 25, 2020

Recent Articles By Bryan

February 19, 2025
Judge Won't Halt PBM Case Over Attack On FTC Independence
February 14, 2025
FTC's Ferguson, PBMs Agree: Nix Leader Removal Safeguards
February 11, 2025
Split 3rd Circ. Keeps Merck Vaccine Antitrust Panel Immunity
February 10, 2025
UnitedHealth Says Fed Suit Imperils Deal's Many Benefits
January 30, 2025
DOJ Calls UnitedHealth Dismissal Bid A Discovery 'End Run'
January 10, 2025
Infosys Files Antitrust Counterclaims In Trade Secrets Suit
January 09, 2025
Amgen Says Enbrel Protected By Legit Patents, Rulings
January 03, 2025
DOJ Wants Oct. Amedisys Trial, UnitedHealth Wants Aug.
December 19, 2024
FTC Says PBMs Can't Get Preliminary Block In Insulin Case
December 03, 2024
PE-Backed Anesthesia Giant Can't Duck Antitrust Claims