Attys Accused Of Judge Shopping Must Turn Over Q&A Doc

By Emily Sawicki · June 17, 2024, 4:44 PM EDT

Attorneys accused of a coordinated effort to "judge shop" amid federal suits challenging an Alabama law banning certain medical procedures for transgender youth must supply a document the court believes displays...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Order

Case Information

Case Title

Boe et al v. Marshall et al

Case Number

Court

Alabama Middle

Nature of Suit

Constitutional - State Statute

Date Filed

April 19, 2022

Recent Articles By Emily

July 03, 2024
Cooley DQ'd From IP Case Over Atty's Past Patent Work
July 03, 2024
Contentious Ala. Gender Care Case Partly Paused
June 25, 2024
Gov't Asks Ala. Fed. Court To Stay Gender Care Case
June 24, 2024
Jurisdictional Discovery Ordered In NJ COVID Test Fraud Suit
June 21, 2024
Attys Accused Of Judge Shopping Must Share Public Remarks
June 20, 2024
Attys Accused Of Judge Shopping Rebut Fraud Allegations
June 07, 2024
Speech Pathologists Say BakerHostetler Bungled Biz Deal
May 23, 2024
Stryker Unit And Seyfarth Attys Hit With $275K Sanctions
May 10, 2024
Pharvaris CLO Set To Step Down In June, CFO Will Fill In
April 05, 2024
Judge Won't Recuse Herself From Doctor's NBA Fraud Trial