Insurer Maintains That Policy Doesn't Cover Guard's Theft

By Joe Van Acker · November 4, 2015, 2:43 PM EST

Continental Casualty Co. asked a Florida federal judge on Tuesday to rule for a second time that it wasn't obligated to defend Admiral Security Services against allegations stemming from one of...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Summary Judgment

Case Information

Case Title

CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY V RED COATS INC

Case Number

Court

Florida Northern

Nature of Suit

Insurance

Date Filed

October 11, 2012

Recent Articles By Joe

February 24, 2016
Nat'l Union Beats Anheuser Unit's Mold Claims In 8th Circ.
February 19, 2016
UPMC Says Insurer Must Cover $12.5M Antitrust Settlement
February 17, 2016
Insurer Pushes For Interest In Owen Gleaton Malpractice Row
January 20, 2016
Anthem Denies That Massive Data Breach Did Harm
January 12, 2016
Philip Morris Rips Smokers' 'Inflammatory' Jury Instructions
December 22, 2015
9th Circ. Won't Bar Access To Patient Data In Monopoly Suit
December 11, 2015
Excellus Faces Fresh Claims Over Breach That Affected 10M
December 07, 2015
GCs Love These Firms More And More
December 07, 2015
5 Firms Make It Back Onto GCs' Most Adored List
November 24, 2015
LabMD Sues 3 FTC Lawyers Over Data Security Case