In Re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406
Case Number:
2:13-cv-20000
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Axinn Veltrop
- Serkland Law Firm
- Foley & Lardner
- Shelby Roden LLC
- Simons & Associates Law
- Balch & Bingham
- Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black
- Phillips Lytle
- Quinn Connor Weaver
- Cohen Milstein
- Cory Watson Attorneys
- The McKay Firm
- Sharp Law LLP
- Holland & Knight
- Cozen O'Connor
- Maynard Nexsen
- Penn & Seaborn
- Kilpatrick Townsend
- Eberle Berlin Kading Turnbow & McKlveen
- Ausman Law Firm
- Yuhl Carr
- Gentle Turner
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Levin Papantonio
- Foote Mielke
- Glast Phillips
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Wallace Jordan
- Murray Law Firm LLC
- Quinn Emanuel
- Dominick Feld
- Chapman Lewis & Swan
- Lane Powell
- Kozyak Tropin
- Means Gillis
- Honigman LLP
- Meierhenry Sargent
- Law Offices of Stephen M. Hansen
- Spotswood Sansom
- NastLaw
- Provosty & Gankendorff
- Crowe & Dunlevy
- Schlichter Bogard
- Sommers Schwartz
- Faegre Drinker
- Pendley Baudin
- Bailey & Glasser
- Beck Amsden
- Giarmarco Mullins
- Gray & White
- Guin Stokes
- Murray Law Firm
- Gurley Law
- Burr & Forman
- Bainbridge Mims
- Baker Wotring
- Methvin Terrell
- White Arnold & Dowd
- Cusimano Roberts
- Paul Weiss
- Beasley Allen
- Solberg Stewart
- Hart Law LLC
- Pittman Firm
- Taylor Porter
- Liskow & Lewis
- Stone & Magnanini
- Mason LLP (Washington, DC)
- Eyster Key
- Pomerantz LLP
- Cooper & Kirk
- Archie Lamb & Associates
- Hickey & Evans
- Fox Rothschild
- Morris King & Hodge
- Dampier Law Firm
- Lynch Carpenter
- Wiggins Childs
- Pittman Dutton
- Brooks Pierce
- Hausfeld LLP
- Lockridge Grindal
- Riley & Jackson
- Redgrave LLP
- Shamoun & Norman
- Brunini Grantham
- Hunton Andrews
- Bodman PLC
- Reichard & Escalera
- Reich & Binstock
- Strom Law Firm
- Adams & Reese
- Calcaterra Pollack
- A&O Shearman
- Mooney Green
- Shaheen & Gordon
- Podhurst Orseck
- Butler Snow LLP
- BoiesBattin
- Boies Schiller
- Bronster Fujichaku
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Ellis Head
- Butler Prather
- Hogan Lovells
- Stites & Harbison
- Miller & Chevalier
- Reed Smith
- Meshbesher & Spence
- Gustafson Gluek
- Nelson Mullins
- Armbrecht Jackson
- Jinks Crow
- RichardsonClement PC
- Baker Donelson
- Horn Aylward
- John D. Saxon PC
- Cafferty Clobes
- Saeed & Little
- Campbell Partners
- Jones & Swartz
- Carroll Warren
- Greenberg Traurig
- Cravath Swaine
- Crowell & Moring
- CR Legal Team
- Wandro Kanne
- Whatley Kallas
- Whitfield Bryson
- Kapke Willerth
- Lightfoot Franklin
- Wojtalewicz Law Firm
- Wright Lindsey
- Wyatt Tarrant
- Zuckerman Spaeder
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- White & Case
Companies
- Blue Cross of Idaho Health Service
- Blue Cross Blue Shield Association
- Health Care Service Corp.
- Excellus BlueCross BlueShield
- Premera Blue Cross
- Highmark Capital Management Inc.
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Inc.
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota
- BlueCross BlueShield of Arizona Inc.
- HealthNow New York Inc.
- Blue Shield of California
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 18, 2018
BCBS Shielded By Old Deals In Antitrust MDL, Judge Rules
Blue Cross Blue Shield insurers facing long-running multidistrict litigation over an alleged conspiracy to divvy up the market are protected by prior settlement agreements that free them from the claims, even though they never signed the deals, an Alabama federal judge ruled Wednesday.
-
June 13, 2018
BCBS Can Appeal Ruling That Limits Antitrust MDL Defense
An Alabama federal judge Tuesday gave his blessing to a bid by Blue Cross Blue Shield plans facing a multidistrict antitrust suit for an immediate appeal of a ruling that bars the health insurer from arguing there were pro-competitive benefits from alleged collaboration between the plans.
-
May 25, 2018
BCBS Wants Instant Appeal Of Per Se Ruling In Antitrust MDL
Blue Cross Blue Shield insurers urged an Alabama federal judge on Thursday to allow for an immediate appeal of a ruling that found they have to face the strict per se standard, which presumes that an alleged plot to divvy up geographic markets by the insurance plans was unlawful.
-
May 02, 2018
BCBS Antitrust Judge Out Of Patience, But Not GIFs
An exasperated Alabama federal judge chastised the Blue Cross Blue Shield network and insurance providers over their discovery spats in antitrust litigation concerning BCBS' alleged exclusivity agreements, taking the unusual step Tuesday of voicing his frustration through an animated GIF of Tom Hanks mouthing "Really?"
-
April 16, 2018
Merger Case Can't Be Used To Rule Anthem Facts Undisputed
An Alabama federal judge on Monday found that the plaintiffs in an antitrust multidistrict litigation against Blue Cross Blue Shield can't declare facts about Blue Cross subsidiary Anthem undisputed based on the ruling that sunk last year's $54 million Cigna Corp.-Anthem merger.
-
April 06, 2018
BCBS Must Face Tough Per Se Test In Antitrust MDL
An Alabama federal judge decided Thursday that health care providers and subscribers suing Blue Cross Blue Shield insurers need only prove that the insurance plans plotted to divvy up geographic markets to succeed on those claims in antitrust multidistrict litigation, dealing a setback to the network.
-
December 07, 2017
BCBS Units Must Produce Additional Docs In Antitrust MDL
An Alabama federal judge has ordered two Georgia-based Blue Cross Blue Shield units operated by Anthem to produce missing data in multidistrict litigation alleging the health care provider fixed insurance prices, telling the provider that if it does not submit the documents, it must explain why under oath.
-
April 07, 2017
BCBS Fires Back At Reconsideration Bid In Antitrust MDL
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama fought back Thursday after subscribers suing it for price-fixing sought to undo a federal judge's ruling that trimmed their claims against the insurer, saying the subscribers were just rehashing arguments that had already been rejected in the ruling itself.
-
March 24, 2017
Subscribers Want Blue Cross Antitrust MDL Trims Rethought
Insurance subscribers in multidistrict litigation accusing Blue Cross Blue Shield of a massive price-fixing conspiracy asked an Alabama federal judge to reconsider some of his summary judgment ruling, arguing Thursday that the company's out-of-state plans don't qualify for antitrust immunity.
-
February 24, 2017
Claims Slip Through Ala. BCBS Defenses In Antitrust MDL
An Alabama federal judge on Thursday said Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama was entitled to summary judgment on some claims in multidistrict litigation alleging a vast price-fixing conspiracy among BCBS plans but said it was only partially protected by an antitrust immunity doctrine.