TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd v. Telefonaktienbolaget LM Ericsson et al
Case Number:
8:14-cv-00341
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Alston & Bird
- Baker Botts
- Crowell & Moring
- DLA Piper
- Gray Reed
- Greenberg Traurig
- Hueston Hennigan
- Keller & Anderle
- Kirkland & Ellis
- K&L Gates
- McKool Smith
- Ni Wang & Massand
- Nixon Peabody
- Sheppard Mullin
- Sidley Austin
- Skiermont Derby
- White & Case
- WilmerHale
- Wilson Sonsini
Companies
- Apple Inc.
- BlackBerry Ltd.
- Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
- InterDigital Inc.
- LG Electronics Inc.
- Motorola Solutions Inc.
- Nokia Corp.
- PanOptis LLC
- QUALCOMM Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Sharp Corp.
- TCL Technology Group Corp.
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
- ZTE Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 19, 2021
Ericsson, TCL Settle Wireless Tech Patent Licensing Battle
Chinese smartphone maker TCL on Friday reached a confidential settlement with Swedish telecommunications giant Ericsson after more than seven years of litigation in California federal court over licensing rates for standard-essential patents on wireless technology.
-
January 03, 2021
2021 Trials To Watch As Litigants Return To Court — Hopefully
After a year in which the coronavirus pandemic swiped numerous important trials off the table, 2021 is widely hoped to bring broad vaccine availability and a return to the courtroom for many who have been awaiting their days in court.
-
December 14, 2020
April FRAND Trial Between Ericsson, TCL Pushed Over COVID
A California federal judge on Monday vacated an upcoming trial date set for patent licensing litigation between Ericsson and Chinese smartphone maker TCL, citing the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason for the delay.
-
December 03, 2020
Ericsson, TCL Say April Trial 'Highly Unlikely' Amid COVID-19
Ericsson and the Chinese smartphone maker TCL both argued their six-year saga over licensing rates for standard-essential patents on 3G and 4G wireless technology is not likely to end up going to trial next April, as it's "essentially inevitable" that a jury still won't be able to convene in five months because of the ongoing pandemic.
-
April 03, 2020
New Trial For Ericsson After Fed. Circ. 'Unravels' FRAND Rate
Ericsson and Chinese smartphone maker TCL will sort out their dispute over licensing rates for TCL's standard-essential wireless patents at trial, after a California federal judge said the Federal Circuit's remand of the case "unraveled" his entire judgment.
-
January 04, 2018
4 Things To Know About The Latest FRAND Rate-Setting Case
A California federal judge added to case law on standard-essential patents late last month by holding that Ericsson did not offer to license its patents on reasonable terms, then becoming only the fourth U.S. judge to determine a royalty rate for essential patents. Here are four takeaways from the decision.
-
February 28, 2017
Ericsson IP Chief Testifies TCL License Terms Were Fair
Ericsson Inc.'s head of intellectual property testified Tuesday in a California federal bench trial over whether it offered Chinese cellphone developer TCL fair license terms, defending Ericsson's proposal that TCL pay a flat rate on its low-priced phones rather than the percentage royalty it publicly advocated for premium-priced phone makers.
-
February 15, 2017
Ericsson FRAND Trial Enters Day 2 With TCL Expert
A California federal judge overseeing the second day of a bench trial on whether Ericsson Inc. offered Chinese mobile phone developer TCL nondiscriminatory license terms for wireless technology standard-essential patents took the reins Wednesday in questioning TCL's economics expert, pressing the witness on how to compare terms granted to other companies.
-
August 01, 2016
Some Ericsson Patent Terms Made To TCL Deemed Fair
A California federal judge has ruled that some of the license terms Ericsson Inc. offered a Chinese mobile phone developer for standard-essential patents for wireless technology were fair and reasonable, narrowing the developer's claims in its suit alleging Ericsson overcharged it.
-
May 27, 2016
Chinese Phone Co. Can't Cite Ericsson Arbitration Loss
A California federal judge refused Thursday to find that Ericsson Inc. charged a Chinese mobile phone developer an excessive rate for standard-essential patents for wireless technology, saying it would be unfair to apply an arbitration decision issued in a licensing dispute between Ericsson and another company.