Hunter et al v. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation et al

  1. May 03, 2023

    $5.3M Settlement Approved In Workers' No-Poach Lawsuit

    An Ohio federal judge approved a combined settlement of nearly $5.3 million in a class action alleging three U.S. defense contractors colluded to not hire each other's employees, resulting in suppressed wages, restricted mobility and eliminated competition, according to the workers.

  2. March 09, 2023

    Workers' Attys Seek $4M From Booz Allen No-Poach Deal

    Counsel for a proposed class of workers asked an Ohio federal judge to approve $3.95 million in fees and costs Thursday for their work securing two settlements worth $5.25 million from Booz Allen Hamilton and two of its rival defense contractors over their alleged "no-poaching" agreement.

  3. September 06, 2022

    Booz Allen, Rival Cut $5M Deal To End Workers' No-Poach Suit

    Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. and a rival defense contractor have agreed to pay workers at an intelligence operations center in England up to $5.05 million to resolve proposed class claims that the companies took part in a wide-spanning "no poach" and wage-fixing scheme, according to a Tuesday filing.

  4. December 20, 2021

    DOJ Fight Over Treatment Of No-Poach Cases Heats Up

    Health care companies battling separate U.S. Department of Justice criminal no-poach cases criticized prosecutors in both of those cases Friday for citing an important procedural win in a wage-fixing case as favoring the government's side.

  5. September 17, 2021

    CACI Settles No-Poach Claims From Intelligence Workers

    CACI International Inc. has reached a deal over claims in Ohio federal court accusing it of agreeing with Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. and Mission Essential Personnel LLC to not hire each other's employees for intelligence contracting work at a U.S. military installation in England.

  6. February 07, 2019

    Booz Allen Made 'No Poach' Pact, Intelligence Worker Says

    Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., CACI International Inc. and Mission Essential Personnel LLC illegally agreed not to hire each others' employees for intelligence contracting work at a U.S. military installation in England, a former employee alleged Thursday in a proposed class action in Ohio federal court.