STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
Case Number:
1:20-cv-03715
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Berkowitz Lichtstein
- Dechert LLP
- Foley & Lardner
- Orrick Herrington
- Patterson Belknap
- Ropes & Gray
- Williams & Connolly
- Wilson Sonsini
Companies
Government Agencies
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- State of Maryland
- State of Nevada
- State of Tennessee
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 31, 2023
DOJ Insists Apple Execs Must Testify In Google Search Trial
Three Apple executives can't escape testifying at the U.S. Department of Justice's looming trial over Google's search dominance, the government told a D.C. federal judge in a filing unsealed Thursday, arguing it will be prejudiced if it can't examine the employees "given Apple's central role in the case."
-
August 21, 2023
Google Wants No 'Abandoned' IoT Claims In DOJ Search Trial
The U.S. Department of Justice shouldn't be able to present evidence of claims it's abandoned in the looming bench trial accusing Google of signing illegally exclusionary default search contracts with web browsers, wireless services and phone makers, the company told a D.C. federal judge in a brief unsealed Friday.
-
August 16, 2023
Google Calls Search Quality 'Critical Defect' In DOJ Case
Google urged a D.C. federal judge Tuesday not to let the U.S. Department of Justice block evidence of the quality of its search engine and the benefits of default contracts with web browsers, wireless services and phone makers from a looming bench trial, arguing they're central elements of the case.
-
August 15, 2023
Apple's AI, Merger VPs Fight To Avoid Google Witness Stand
Apple Inc. thinks providing 21.5 hours of deposition testimony and more than 1 million pages of documents is enough participation in the U.S. Department of Justice's looming trial over Google LLC's search dominance, telling a D.C. federal judge in a filing unsealed Monday that there's no need for three company vice presidents to testify live.
-
August 04, 2023
DOJ Bound For Google Search Trial, Core Claims Intact
A D.C. federal judge teed up the first Big Tech antitrust conduct case of the modern era for trial in an order unsealed Friday preserving the core of the U.S. Department of Justice case accusing Google of anti-competitively exclusive contracts making its search engine the default on phones and browsers.
-
August 02, 2023
DOJ Wants Limits On Google's Search Innovation Arguments
The U.S. Department of Justice and state-level enforcers are looking to prevent Google from arguing during a coming September trial that the quality of its products offers a complete defense to claims that it monopolizes search and search advertising markets.
-
June 28, 2023
Google Must Turn Over Memos For Search Case Sanctions Bid
A D.C. federal court on Wednesday ordered Google to turn over memos instructing employees to preserve internal chats after claims from the U.S. Department of Justice and state enforcers that the company destroyed evidence in their search monopolization case.
-
April 27, 2023
Google Search Judge Needs More Info On Chat Sanctions Bid
The D.C. federal judge overseeing federal and state enforcers' actions accusing Google of monopolizing search and search advertising markets called for more information Thursday about a pending bid to sanction the company for deleting internal employee chats.
-
April 17, 2023
DOJ, Google Dispute When Gov't Discovered Chat Deletions
The U.S. Department of Justice's bid to sanction Google for failing to preserve internal chats may come down to timing, according to last week's hearing and a DOJ filing, unsealed Monday, that continued to assail the search giant's claim that government attorneys knew about Google's chat deletion policies for years.
-
March 20, 2023
Google Calls Sanctions Bid In Search Monopoly Case Too Late
Google has urged a District of Columbia federal court to reject a bid from the U.S. Department of Justice and a group of states for sanctions over its deletion of employee chats in a search and search advertising monopolization case, arguing that the effort comes far too late.