Robert Platt v. Sodexo, S.A., et al
Case Number:
23-55737
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 24, 2024
ERISA Arbitration Backers See Hope In 2nd Circ. Dissent
A split Second Circuit panel backed workers — and joined three other circuits — when it rejected an attempt to force a proposed class action Employee Retirement Income Security Act lawsuit into individual arbitration, but employers are seizing on a dissent from the recent ruling to try to turn the tide.
-
March 07, 2024
NC Decision Supports Nix Of Sodexo Arbitration, 9th Circ. Told
A Sodexo employee alleging that the company overcharged smokers for health insurance told the Ninth Circuit that a North Carolina federal court decision supports his efforts to keep his suit in court, saying it backs up his assertion that arbitration agreements can't be added to plans without participants' consent.
-
March 04, 2024
Sodexo Nicotine Surcharge Suit Gets Backing From DOL
The U.S. Department of Labor backed a proposed class action accusing food provider Sodexo of unlawfully charging employees who use nicotine $1,200 more per year for health insurance, telling the Ninth Circuit that the arbitration agreement the company wants to use to sink the case conflicts with federal benefits law.
-
January 01, 2024
5 Employee Benefits Cases To Watch In 2024
Employees will seek to revive their suit claiming Yale University mismanaged its $5.5 billion retirement plan, Republican attorneys general will try to sink Labor Department regulations on socially conscious investing, and a food services company will look to force a suit over a healthcare surcharge for nicotine users into arbitration. Here are five cases benefits attorneys should watch in 2024.
-
December 01, 2023
Sodexo Asks 9th Circ. To Force Arbitration In ERISA Suit
Sodexo urged the Ninth Circuit to force a worker to arbitrate his claims alleging the food services company unlawfully required workers who use nicotine products to pay $1,200 more per year for health insurance, saying it doesn't matter that he didn't consent to the insurance plan's arbitration provision.