Wineesa Cole v. Asurion Corporation et al

  1. February 16, 2016

    $4.2M T-Mobile Class Deal OK'd After Objector No-Show

    A California judge Tuesday approved T-Mobile's $4.2 million deal to settle class action claims that they fraudulently misrepresented their cellphone insurance to customers, after the deal's lone opponent and his attorney – who plaintiffs lambasted as a "serial objector" facing bar suspension – failed to appear in court.

  2. February 09, 2016

    T-Mobile, Class Action Lead Slam Protest To $4.2M Deal

    T-Mobile USA Inc. and a woman who sued it over cellphone insurance joined forces Monday in urging a California federal judge to toss the lone protest to their $4.2 million class action settlement, saying the protester received sufficient notice and that his attorney is a "serial objector" who faces suspension.

  3. January 27, 2016

    Class Member Urges Court To Reject $4.2M T-Mobile Deal

    A man in line to receive part of a proposed $4.2 million class action settlement over cellphone insurance for T-Mobile customers implored a California federal court Tuesday to reject the deal, saying it pays the attorneys too much and the customers too little.

  4. November 03, 2015

    T-Mobile To Pay $4.2M To Settle Phone Insurance Suit

    T-Mobile and its cellphone insurance provider agreed Tuesday to pay $4.2 million to settle a class action accusing the companies of failing to tell people who purchase insurance that their broken, stolen or lost phones could be replaced with a refurbished or different model.