NEW JERSEY PHYSICIANS UNITED RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE v. BOYNTON & BOYNTON, INC. et al

  1. August 24, 2017

    Insurer Expert Report Included Improper Info, Judge Says

    A New Jersey federal judge ruled Wednesday that New Jersey Physicians United Reciprocal Exchange was wrong to submit an expert report that relied on information it hadn't provided in discovery in a pair of unfair competition cases the medical malpractice insurer is bringing against two competitors.

  2. September 02, 2014

    Atty Must Comply With Limited Deposition In Insurer Ad Suit

    A New Jersey federal judge on Tuesday ordered an insurance attorney to cooperate with subpoenas from medical malpractice insurer New Jersey Physicians United Reciprocal Exchange in an unfair competition suit, but constrained deposition questioning to allow the attorney, a nonparty, to avoid becoming a defendant.

  3. June 10, 2013

    NJ Pure Says Fox Rothschild Should Stay In Competition Suit

    Medical malpractice insurer New Jersey Physicians United Reciprocal Exchange told a federal judge Monday that its counsel in an unfair competition suit against a rival shouldn't be disqualified because Fox Rothschild LLP's connection to the rival doesn't create a conflict of interest.