Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, et al., Petitioners v. The California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program, et al.

Track this case

Case Number:

21-558

Court:

Supreme Court

Nature of Suit:

  1. February 28, 2022

    High Court Won't Review Win For Calif. Auto-IRA Program

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to breathe new life into a challenge to a California program that steers some of workers' earnings into retirement accounts, leaving in place a Ninth Circuit ruling that said the program wasn't preempted by federal benefits law.

  2. February 07, 2022

    Anti-Tax Group Slams Calif. Auto-IRA Defense In ERISA Row

    An anti-tax group urged the U.S. Supreme Court to reject arguments from California officials that the state's auto-retirement program was outside the purview of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, warning the high court that its input was crucial before other states followed suit.

  3. January 21, 2022

    CalSavers Urges Supreme Court To Reject Auto-IRA Appeal

    California's state-run retirement program on Friday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reject an anti-tax group's challenge, arguing that the Ninth Circuit correctly found that the program wasn't preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act because it's not an "employee benefit plan" under ERISA.

  4. January 03, 2022

    ERISA Cases To Keep An Eye On In 2022

    Benefits attorneys will be waiting to see if the U.S. Supreme Court revives a suit against Northwestern University, and wondering whether the high court will weigh in on cases involving California's state-run retirement program and pharmacy benefit managers' latitude in setting drug prices. Here, Law360 previews six ERISA cases, at the high court and below, to watch in the coming year.

  5. November 03, 2021

    High Court Wants More Input On Calif. Auto-IRA Battle

    The U.S. Supreme Court asked a California state official to respond to an anti-tax group's petition for high court review of a Ninth Circuit ruling, which found the state's auto-retirement program was not preempted by federal law.