Heritage Company Inc v. Hudson Excess Insurance Company et al

  1. May 23, 2024

    Ark. Judge Sides With Insurer's Cyber Policy Interpretation

    An Arkansas federal judge ruled an insurer correctly evaluated a telemarketing company's losses from a cyberattack, agreeing that "normal operating expenses" the company paid from revenue during that period aren't included in the loss and that any other interpretation would give the company a windfall.

  2. November 16, 2022

    Co. Can't Get Windfall From Cyberattack Coverage, Court Told

    A now-shuttered telemarketing company's proposed calculation of business interruption coverage for a 2019 cyberattack would impermissibly leave it better off than if it had never been attacked, the company's insurer told an Arkansas federal court.

  3. October 03, 2022

    Broker, Underwriter Slip Cyberattack Coverage Suit

    An Arkansas federal court on Monday dismissed an insurance broker and underwriter from a suit by a now-shuttered telemarketing company seeking coverage for a cyberattack, saying the two were not part of the insurance contract at issue and therefore were not properly sued.

  4. April 19, 2022

    Broker, Underwriter Want Off Cyberattack Coverage Suit

    An insurance broker and underwriter asked on Tuesday to be dropped from a now-shuttered telemarketing company's suit seeking business interruption coverage for a cyberattack, telling an Arkansas federal court they're not under contract with the company.

  5. January 31, 2022

    Insurers Must Cover Firm For Cyberattack, Ark. Court Told

    A now-shuttered telemarketing company told an Arkansas federal court its insurers owe it coverage for a 2019 cyberattack that caused it to suspend operations and reportedly lay off its workforce, saying that its policy was specifically worded to cover that type of business interruption.