Ryan LLC v. Federal Trade Commission
Case Number:
3:24-cv-00986
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Judge:
Firms
- Bradley Arant
- Burns Charest
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Davis Polk
- Epstein Becker
- Fairmark Partners LLP
- Fillmore Law Firm
- Gibson Dunn
- Hodgson Russ
- Hooper Lundy
- Mayer Brown
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Seyfarth Shaw
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Tremain Artaza
Companies
- American Hospital Association
- American Hotel & Lodging Association
- American Property Casualty Insurance Association
- Business Roundtable
- Consumer Technology Association
- Federation of American Hospitals Inc.
- International Franchise Association
- National Association of Manufacturers
- National Employment Law Project
- National Federation of Independent Business
- National Retail Federation Inc.
- New York University
- NYU Langone Medical Center
- Public Citizen Inc.
- Ryan LLC
- United States Council for International Business
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 03, 2024
FTC Gets Backing Against Noncompete Rule Challenge
The Federal Trade Commission has received backing against a challenge of its new rule banning noncompete clauses, with a labor group, local lawmakers and others urging a Texas federal court not to prevent the rule from taking effect in September.
-
May 31, 2024
Texas Judge Opts Not To Recuse And Tosses Chamber Suit
A Texas federal judge has thrown out the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's suit seeking to block the Federal Trade Commission from implementing a ban on noncompete clauses because a different plaintiff was first to file, adding he declined to recuse himself because no companies in his stock portfolio were parties in the case.
-
May 15, 2024
Noncompete Rule Challenge Gets More Backing
A slew of business groups have thrown their support behind a challenge of the Federal Trade Commission's sweeping ban on noncompete clauses for employees, saying the rule relies on "cherrypicked" data to back a policy preferred by the FTC's majority.
-
May 13, 2024
Chamber Asks Texas Judge To Stop FTC Noncompete Ban
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce asked a Texas federal judge to issue a court order stopping the Federal Trade Commission's new noncompete rule from going into effect while litigation challenging the ban plays out, arguing the rule's enforcement would irreparably harm businesses and their employees.
-
May 10, 2024
Chamber OK'd To Intervene Against FTC Noncompete Rule
A Texas federal judge gave the U.S. Chamber of Commerce the go-ahead to intervene in Ryan LLC's first-to-file challenge of the Federal Trade Commission's ban on employee contract noncompete agreements, putting the trade group back in the fight after its own lawsuit was paused.
-
May 09, 2024
Watchdog Seeks Texas Judge's Recusal In Noncompete Case
An industry watchdog is calling on U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker to step away from the U.S. Chamber's lawsuit in Texas federal court challenging the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's new noncompete rule, citing "ample financial conflicts" including his investments in Amazon, Apple and IBM, two of which are members of the Chamber.
-
May 06, 2024
Chamber's Noncompete Challenge On Hold For Earlier Case
A Texas federal court has paused the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's case challenging the Federal Trade Commission's pending ban on noncompetes and encouraged the group to join a case filed a day earlier by tax services and software company Ryan LLC.
-
May 03, 2024
Chamber Blasts FTC Bid For Member IDs In Noncompete Suit
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is defending its ability to represent anonymous members in its Texas federal suit challenging the Federal Trade Commission's pending noncompete ban, arguing that the FTC's attempt to block that representation is "radical and unprecedented."
-
May 01, 2024
Chamber Must Name Cos. It Reps In Noncompete Suit, FTC Says
The Federal Trade Commission has asked a Texas federal judge to limit the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to representing only named members in its challenge to the agency's pending noncompetes ban, arguing the trade group can't hide behind the First Amendment to represent "millions of undisclosed members."
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →