Mealey's Construction Defects Insurance
-
July 25, 2023
Glass Installer Appeals Ruling For CGL, Umbrella Insurers To 3rd Circuit
CAMDEN, N.J. — A glass installer has appealed to the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a New Jersey federal judge’s June ruling that its commercial general liability and umbrella insurers are not liable to cover defense and indemnity costs it incurred in settling an underlying action alleging that a glass curtain wall it installed became visibly obstructed by a dark “dripping” material because there was no property damage caused by an occurrence during the policy periods.
-
July 25, 2023
Oregon Supreme Court Accepts Homeowners’ Appeal In Defects Coverage Suit
SALEM, Ore. — The Oregon Supreme Court has agreed to review homeowners’ appeal of an appellate court ruling that a commercial general liability insurer has no duty to indemnify them or its contractor insured for a coverage dispute over faulty work performed in building their home.
-
July 25, 2023
Judge: Roofer Cannot Apply Payments From Other Insurers Toward SIR Endorsement
MIAMI — Because a provision in a commercial general liability policy requires the $150,000 retained limit of the self-insured retention (SIR) endorsement to be paid by the insured, a roofing company cannot apply third-party payments from other insurers toward the limit, a federal judge in Florida ruled in denying the insured’s motion for partial summary judgment in its breach of contract suit against its CGL insurer.
-
July 25, 2023
Judge Denies Roofing Insurer’s Motion To Reconsider Dismissal Of Declaratory Action
PHILADELPHIA — A federal judge in Pennsylvania has denied an insurer’s request for reconsideration of the dismissal of its declaratory relief action stemming from two negligence and faulty work lawsuits against its roofing contractor insured, saying he “properly interpreted and applied the law, and did not rely upon erroneous factual conclusions” when he dismissed the case sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction.
-
July 24, 2023
No Additional Abrupt Collapse Coverage Owed, Insurer Argues To 10th Circuit
DENVER — An insurer and its claims service manager argue to the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that a building owner insured is owed no coverage under an insurance policy’s additional abrupt collapse coverage, contending that the insured’s building “did not collapse because its structural capacity was not ‘substantially’ or ‘significantly’ impaired.”
-
July 22, 2023
Judge Rules In Favor Of Engineering Firm, Property Manager In Collapse Dispute
LEXINGTON, Ky. — A federal judge in Kentucky held that an engineering firm is entitled to summary judgment in an insurer’s subrogation lawsuit arising from a parking garage collapse because the insurer’s negligence and misrepresentation claims are barred by the statute of limitations, further granting a property manager’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s fraudulent concealment claim against it.
-
July 20, 2023
Sufficient Facts Alleged In Support Of Statutory Bad Faith Claim In Defects Suit
GREENBELT, Md. — A Maryland federal judge denied an insurer’s motion to dismiss a claim for statutory bad faith after determining that the insured general contractor alleged sufficient facts in support of its claim that the insurer acted in bad faith by failing to process its claim for coverage of a faulty wall system installed as part of a construction project within 45 days as required under Maryland law.
-
July 20, 2023
Earth Movement Caused By Faulty Workmanship Or Settling Is Covered, Judge Finds
MINNEAPOLIS — Finding that whether three insurers “intended to create an anti-concurrent causation clause” in their policies’ earth movement definition is “ambiguous,” a federal judge in Minnesota determined that earth movement caused by faulty workmanship or settling is covered by the earth movement coverage extension in the policies, “regardless of if the faulty workmanship and/or settling is the proximate cause of the loss,” granting partial summary judgment to their mutual insured.
-
July 19, 2023
11th Circuit Dismisses Developer’s Appeal Of Judgment For Insurer
ATLANTA — The 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has dismissed with prejudice a development company and its owner’s appeal of a lower court ruling granting summary judgment in favor of its commercial general liability insurer in a declaratory relief action over damage caused to a neighboring pond during a construction project after the parties jointly stipulated to the dismissal.
-
July 18, 2023
California Panel Affirms Dismissal Of Homeowners Insurer, Bank From Construction Row
LOS ANGELES — A California appeals panel has affirmed the dismissal of a homeowners insurer and a mortgage lender from a construction company’s suit seeking to $128,187.34 for work it performed on the homeowners’ house that an arbitrator found was offset by the homeowners’ damages for construction defects, among other things, finding that the company’s claims against the insurer and bank are derivative of its claims against the homeowners and, therefore, barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion.
-
July 17, 2023
Insurers Refute Argument That Wind-Driven Rain Must Be Treated As ‘Separate’ Peril
SEATTLE — Responding to a condominium owners association insured’s appeal in a water damage repairs coverage suit, insurers argued to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that the Washington Supreme Court’s recent unanimous ruling Hill & Stout, PLLC v. Mut. of Enumclaw Ins. Co. precludes the insured’s argument that wind-driven rain must be treated as a “separate” peril under the policy.
-
July 17, 2023
Homeowners Association Appeals Ruling For Insurer In Suit Arising From Roof Damage
LOS ANGELES — A condominium homeowners association has appealed a California judge’s grant of summary judgment to its insurer in its breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit arising from storm damage to the roof of a Studio City building that housed 31 luxury condominiums.
-
July 14, 2023
Lacking Jurisdiction, 4th Circuit Dismisses Contractor’s Insurer’s Appeal
RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has dismissed an insurer’s appeal of a district court’s ruling that it had a duty to defend a general contractor in an underlying construction defects action, finding that even if the interlocutory order was injunctive and required the insurer to take action, because the underlying case has settled, it has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
-
July 14, 2023
Judge Dismisses Insurers’ Coverage Suit Over $5.6M Construction Defects Judgment
FORT PIERCE, Fla. — A federal judge in Florida has dismissed without prejudice insurers’ declaratory judgment lawsuit disputing coverage for a $5.6 million judgment entered against its insured in an underlying construction defects action, finding a magistrate judge’s conclusion that the factors in Ameritas Variable Life Ins. Co. v. Roach “weigh heavily against entertaining the Federal Declaratory Action” to be “well reasoned and correct.”
-
July 13, 2023
Judge: Insurers Do Not Have To Indemnify Subcontractor For Faulty Stucco Work
PHILADELPHIA — A federal judge in Pennsylvania granted judgment on the pleadings to two insurers seeking a declaration that they do not have to defend their insured, a stucco subcontractor, against underlying litigation over water damage to homes in a residential community, finding that the damages are alleged to have been caused by faulty workmanship and not an “occurrence.”
-
July 06, 2023
No Indemnification Owed For Defective Silo Construction, Federal Judge Rules
LAREDO, Texas — A federal judge in Texas concluded that an insurer has no duty to indemnify its insured for a lawsuit alleging a defective silo construction, finding that the underlying plaintiff did not incur any “property” damage to trigger coverage and the policy exclusions bar coverage even if the underlying damages were deemed “loss of use” property damage.
-
June 30, 2023
Water Damage Coverage Suit Administratively Closed After Parties Settle
KANSAS CITY, Kan. — A federal judge in Kansas administratively closed a coverage suit stemming from water damage claims at a residential construction project the day after the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement to settle.
-
June 30, 2023
Magistrate Recommends Granting Insurer’s Motion For Default Declaratory Judgment
TAMPA, Fla. — A Florida federal magistrate judge issued a report that recommended granting an insurer’s motion for entry of a default judgment against its stucco installer insured, finding that a policy’s “Condominium, Townhome, Tract or Track Exclusion” excluded coverage for claims that the insured inadequately and improperly installed components of the stucco system and exterior envelope of a single-family home built as a track development.
-
June 30, 2023
District Court Decision In Mold Coverage Suit Must Be Reversed, Insureds Say
ATLANTA — A district court’s ruling that no coverage is owed for mold damage discovered in an insured hotel should be reversed because the policy at issue provides coverage for losses caused by a construction defect even if the cost to fix the defect is not covered, the insureds say in an appellant reply brief filed in the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.
-
June 29, 2023
Contractor Denied Summary Judgment On Subrogee Insurer’s Water Damage Claim
NEW YORK — A New York justice denied without prejudice a plumbing contractor’s motion for summary judgment on claims brought against it by an insurer, as subrogee of an insured restaurant that was damaged by flooding following a construction project, finding that there are issues of fact regarding when the insurer obtained subrogation rights and whether a settlement between the contractor and the property owner estops subrogation.
-
June 27, 2023
Judge: Insurers Not Liable For Glass Installer’s Costs In Underlying Defects Action
CAMDEN, N.J. — Commercial general liability and umbrella insurers are not liable to cover defense and indemnity costs incurred by a glass installer in settling an underlying action alleging that a glass curtain wall it installed became visibly obstructed by a dark “dripping” material because there was no property damage caused by an occurrence during the policy periods, a federal judge in New Jersey found.
-
June 26, 2023
Panel Upholds Finding That Water Damage Suit Is Barred By Suit Limitations Provision
DENVER — The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals upheld a district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of an insurer in a water damage suit after determining that the insured’s suit is barred by the policy’s four-year limitations provision and that insurer’s denial of coverage based on the policy’s exclusions for long-term water leakage and faulty workmanship does not constitute bad faith.
-
June 26, 2023
Contractor Challenges Ruling That Exclusion Bars Coverage For Faulty Installation
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A contractor moved for a Florida federal court to reconsider its Feb. 27 ruling that a commercial general liability insurer is entitled to summary judgment on its declaratory judgment claims in a lawsuit stemming from a subcontractor’s alleged faulty installation of cladding and glazing systems in a construction project, challenging the court’s ruling that the policy’s “course-of-construction” exclusion bars coverage.
-
June 23, 2023
CGL Insurer Responds To Homeowners’ Petition Seeking Oregon High Court Review
SALEM, Ore. — A commercial general liability insurer responded to homeowners’ petition asking the Oregon Supreme Court to review an appeals court’s ruling that the insurer has no duty to indemnify either the homeowners or its contractor insured for a coverage dispute over faulty work performed in building a home, challenging the homeowners’ contention that the appeals court “erroneously read” Oak Crest Construction Co. v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co. “to require tort liability to find an ‘occurrence’ or ‘accident’” under the policy.
-
June 23, 2023
9th Circuit Appeal Of Duty-To-Defend Ruling In Favor Of Contractor Dismissed
SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 22 ordered the dismissal of an insurer’s appeal of a district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of a general contractor in a dispute over the insurer’s duty to defend the contractor in a construction defects suit pursuant to a stipulated motion for voluntary dismissal filed by the parties.