Mealey's Copyright

  • August 19, 2024

    11th Circuit Rejects Artist’s Copyright Claims For Banana Piece

    ATLANTA — A panel of the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 16 affirmed a Florida federal judge’s grant of summary judgment in favor of an artist who saw online virality after duct taping a banana to a wall at a Miami art fair, agreeing with the judge that another artist failed to show how the work infringed on his own art piece also involving a banana duct taped to a wall from nearly two decades earlier.

  • August 16, 2024

    9th Circuit Reverses Finding Of No Jurisdiction In Sumo Wrestling Copyright Fight

    SAN FRANCISCO — A partially split panel of judges in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals partially reversed a California federal judge’s decision to dismiss a copyright infringement dispute between two broadcasting companies over a sumo wrestling competition because the alleged infringement occurred entirely in Japan; the panel majority held that the plaintiff company could conceivably show the circumvention of copyright law occurred domestically.

  • August 15, 2024

    News Outlets Say Stable Diffusion AI Ruling Supports Copyright Case

    NEW YORK — A ruling allowing induced copyright infringement claims and finding Stable Diffusion artificial intelligence itself an infringing work applies to contributory infringement claims alleging that ChatGPT memorized works and will output “near-verbatim” replicas, news outlets argue in an Aug. 14 notice of supplemental authority.

  • August 15, 2024

    Guitar Seller Says 1st Circuit Wrongly Ordered New Trial In Copyright Case

    BOSTON — A guitar seller who was accused of copyright infringement by a guitar manufacturer that said it used a copyrighted photo of guitar headstocks on its website filed a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc after a First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ordered a new trial in a New Hampshire federal court, arguing that the panel widened a circuit split over what standard a court can use to determine the relationship between alleged infringement and subsequent revenue.

  • August 15, 2024

    Judge Says Some AI Copyright Claims Survive In Visual Arts Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — An amended complaint permissibly adds claims and defendants, and while some of those claims are unsuccessful, copyright claims against DeviantArt, Stability AI Ltd. and others survive, thanks in part to new allegations of improper copying of works to train artificial intelligence, a federal judge in California said in partially granting motions to dismiss.

  • August 14, 2024

    5th Circuit Issues Updated Opinion In Copyright Row Over Canadian Legal Codes

    NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued a new version of a July opinion in which it reversed a Texas federal judge’s grant of summary judgment against a publisher accused by a Canadian developer of legal codes and standards of illegally republishing complete versions of the code because the code is effectively uncopyrightable “law” in Canada, removing a reference to the developer referring to itself as a government agency.

  • August 13, 2024

    After Dismissing UCL Claim, Judge Relieves Plaintiffs Of ChatGPT Discovery

    SAN FRANCISCO — Attorney-created prompts and testing of ChatGPT constitute protected opinion work product, and copyright infringement plaintiffs did not waive work product protections by including some results in their complaint, and the protections are not overcome simply because production would shed light on the case, a federal judge in California said in granting relief from a magistrate judge’s ruling.

  • August 12, 2024

    New York Times Says Judge Nixed Ruling OpenAI Cites Ordering Discovery Of Prompts

    NEW YORK — A judge recently overruled a magistrate judge’s order that was cited by OpenAI Inc. and related entities in their effort to obtain prompts and other material related to presuit testing of ChatGPT, the New York Times Co. (NYT) told a federal judge in New York on Aug. 9 in its copyright infringement action against the creators of the artificial intelligence.

  • August 12, 2024

    5th Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Singer’s Copyright Claim Against Rolling Stones

    NEW ORLEANS — In a per curiam opinion, a panel of the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held that a Louisiana federal judge was correct to dismiss a Spanish singer’s copyright infringement complaint against The Rolling Stones, its members and associated record labels because the singer failed to establish that the court had personal jurisdiction over the defendants.

  • August 07, 2024

    Judge Relates Pair Of AI Copyright Actions As Briefing On Dismissal Begins

    SAN FRANCISCO — Arguments about differences in parties and the specificity of claims in two copyright suits might stand in the way of consolidation of the actions but do not prevent relating the cases, which involve artificial intelligence created by defendant Google LLC, a federal judge in California said in a docket entry.

  • August 07, 2024

    D.C. Circuit Affirms Finding That DMCA Does Not Run Afoul Of 1st Amendment

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel rejected two technologists’ challenge to the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), holding that a federal district court rightly enforced the statute’s anti-circumvention provision with regard to technological protection measures (TPMs).

  • August 06, 2024

    Federal Judge Tosses Singer’s ‘Shotgun’ Copyright Suit Targeting Music Companies

    MIAMI — A federal judge in Florida dismissed a copyright claim brought by a Venezuelan musician claiming that several music companies illegally uploaded his music to online music streaming platforms, adopting a federal magistrate judge’s report wherein the magistrate judge found that the musician’s complaint is an impermissible shotgun pleading and that the musician failed to substantiate some of his claims.

  • August 05, 2024

    11th Circuit: Court Must Reconsider If Tech Company’s Full Code Is Copyrightable

    ATLANTA — A panel of the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held that a Florida federal magistrate judge failed to fully consider the copyrightability of the code of a company that makes a software comparing life insurance quotes in a case the company brought against competitors it said stole its trade secrets by taking portions of its database, ordering the judge to make a new finding of facts for the company’s copyright claim

  • August 02, 2024

    Judge Grants Summary Judgment To Airline On Copyright Claim Against Reseller

    FORT WORTH, Texas — A federal judge in Texas held that American Airlines Inc. was entitled to summary judgment on copyright infringement claims it brought against a company that exploits an airline ticket loophole to save customers money on tickets, finding that the company failed to show that its use of the American Airlines flight symbol on its website was a fair use of the flight symbol.

  • August 01, 2024

    1st Circuit Orders New Copyright Infringement Damages Trial For Guitar Maker

    BOSTON — A panel of the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ordered a new jury trial on the issue of infringing profits on a copyright claim brought by a guitar manufacturer who said a guitar seller used a copyrighted photo of guitar headstocks on its website, holding that a New Hampshire federal judge did not accurately explain the manufacturer’s burden of proof in jury instructions.

  • August 01, 2024

    Code Publisher Seeks Rehearing After 5th Circuit Finds Codes Uncopyrightable

    NEW ORLEANS — In a pair of petitions, a Canadian developer of legal standards and codes requested either panel rehearing or rehearing en banc after a split panel in the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed a Texas federal judge’s grant of summary judgment against a publisher accused by the developer of illegally republishing complete versions of the code, arguing that the panel incorrectly held that the codes are effectively “law” in Canada.

  • July 31, 2024

    Authors’ UCL Claim Dismissed From ChatGPT Copyright Case

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on July 30 granted a motion by OpenAI Inc. and affiliates to dismiss authors’ claims that they violated California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by training artificial intelligence on copyrighted material after finding the claim preempted by federal copyright law.

  • July 31, 2024

    Federal Magistrate Judge: Photographer’s Copyright Claims Not Time-Barred

    NEW YORK — A federal magistrate judge in New York recommended that a web company’s motion to dismiss copyright infringement claims brought against it by a photographer be denied, saying the company is wrong to argue that the claims are time-barred because accrual began when the alleged infringement was discovered in 2022, not when the alleged infringement occurred in 2015.

  • July 30, 2024

    Stability AI Wants Copyright Suit Sent To California

    WILMINGTON, Del. — California federal court provides an all-around better location for an artificial intelligence copyright suit, Stability AI Ltd. and related entities told a federal judge in Delaware on July 29, saying that California provides better access to witnesses and evidence, a less congested court and an already pending suit involving similar allegations.

  • July 29, 2024

    Judge: Trade Secret Claims Against TikTok In Copyright Case Adequately Established

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on July 26 denied a request from TikTok Inc. and affiliated entities to compel a China-based company to state with particularity its trade secret source code it says TikTok infringes upon, saying the company included the trade secrets in its complaint with the requisite particularity; the judge’s order was issued days after a previous order in which the judge dismissed a false advertising claim against TikTok with prejudice.

  • July 26, 2024

    Default Judgment For Rapper On Copyright Claims On Hit Single Recommended

    NEW YORK — A federal magistrate judge in New York on July 25 recommended the entry of default judgment against the rapper known as Tekashi 6ix9ine in a copyright dispute brought by a hip-hop producer who alleges that the rapper illegally used a recording copyrighted by the producer in a 2018 single that eventually went platinum, after the rapper failed to make any filings in the case for years.

  • July 25, 2024

    Judge Denies Fees In Copyright, Trade Secret Dispute Between Bronx Music Schools

    NEW YORK — A New York federal judge denied a request by a music school and its founder for reimbursement of the attorney fees they incurred in successfully defending allegations of copyright infringement, unfair competition and trade secret misappropriation, overruling objections from the school and its founder that a federal magistrate judge erred in recommending that the motion be denied.

  • July 23, 2024

    Magistrate Grants Adult Video Company’s Bid To Serve ISP In Illegal Download Row

    ORLANDO, Fla. — A Florida federal magistrate judge on July 22 granted in part a motion filed by an adult video company to serve the internet service provider (ISP) of an unknown defendant accused of copyright infringement related to alleged illegal downloading and distributing of the video company’s content, finding that because serving the ISP is necessary for the company to proceed in this case, the company may serve the ISP with specified protections regarding identifying information.

  • July 23, 2024

    9th Circuit: DMCA Does Not Preclude Forum Non Conveniens Dismissal

    SAN FRANCISCO — A panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 22 upheld a Washington federal judge’s decision to dismiss copyright and trade secret claims between two South Korean video game companies, agreeing with the judge that the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) does not preclude forum non conveniens as a reason for dismissal.

  • July 22, 2024

    Complaint’s Brush Strokes Sufficiently Specific In AI Copyright Suit, Artists Say

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — Allegations that Google LLC and its parent company used copyrighted material to train its artificial intelligence suffices and the plaintiffs need not identify every image at issue in the class action, visual artists tell a federal judge in California in a July 19 brief opposing dismissal.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Copyright archive.