Mealey's Daubert

  • October 16, 2023

    Accident Reconstruction Expert Met Daubert Standards For Testimony, Judge Says

    VALDOSTA, Ga. — A Georgia federal judge denied a motion to exclude an accident reconstruction expert retained by a man who says he was injured after falling from a utility-boom truck’s bucket.

  • October 13, 2023

    MDL Judge: Experts Can Opine Only On General Causation In Vaccine Injury Case

    PHILADELPHIA — Experts retained by a man who alleges that his shingles vaccine caused him to develop Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) can speak on general causation but are barred from opining on specific causation, the Pennsylvania federal judge overseeing the Zostavax multidistrict litigation ruled.

  • October 12, 2023

    Firm Says Plaintiffs’ Expert Should Be Excluded In Flint Water Crisis Litigation

    ANN ARBOR, Mich. — An engineering firm that has been named as a defendant in the litigation related to the lead-contaminated water crisis in Flint, Mich. on Oct. 11 filed a supplemental brief in Michigan federal court arguing that the plaintiffs “should not be allowed to surprise [the firm] with new claims for damages this late into the litigation,” therefore, the court should exclude the plaintiffs’ expert’s testimony about in utero lead exposures.

  • October 12, 2023

    Judge Approves Class In PFAS Case Against DuPont Related To Cape Fear River

    WILMINGTON, N.C. — A federal judge in North Carolina has granted class certification to plaintiffs in a long-running lawsuit against E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. and its affiliates related to claims that they dumped per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the Cape Fear River, resulting in groundwater contamination that caused injuries to resident in the area.

  • October 10, 2023

    Panel Affirms Dismissal Of Deepwater Horizon Injury Case For Lack Of Causation

    NEW ORLEANS — A panel of the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion has agreed with a lower court’s decision that a plaintiff’s medical experts failed to show causation in a lawsuit against BP Exploration & Production Inc. related to injuries the plaintiff allegedly sustained while assisting with the cleanup of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

  • October 10, 2023

    Expert Testimony Limited In Case Alleging Medical Malpractice In Embryo Testing

    CHICAGO — An Illinois federal magistrate judge agreed to limit expert testimony offered by a fertility clinic and a testing laboratory that were sued by a couple who gave birth to a daughter with a genetic defect while also finding that the couple’s expert can testify about the child’s future medical needs.

  • October 10, 2023

    Justice Finds AI DNA Testing Tool Admissible In New York Murder Case

    BROOKLYN, N.Y.  — The fact that an artificial intelligence program used to identify and match DNA and solve a cold-case murder has come under criticism can be investigated on cross-examination but is not grounds to exclude the testing done by the program, a New York justice said in denying a motion to exclude.

  • October 09, 2023

    MDL Judge:  Causation Expert Out In Zostavax Injury Bellwether Case

    PHILADELPHIA — The Pennsylvania federal judge overseeing the Zostavax multidistrict litigation found that proposed testimony from the causation expert retained by the next bellwether plaintiff is inadmissible under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc.

  • October 09, 2023

    Washington Federal Judge Tosses Experts Retained In Slip-And-Fall Case

    SEATTLE — An expert retained by a man who fell inside a Home Depot does not offer any testimony that is beyond the knowledge of a lay juror, and another expert is excluded as a sanction for untimely disclosure, a Washington federal judge ruled.

  • October 06, 2023

    10th Circuit Finds No Error In Excluding Testimony In Fraud, False Statement Case

    DENVER — The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 5 found no error in a trial court’s decision to exclude expert testimony offered on behalf of a man facing fraud charges stemming from a bankruptcy petition, nor did it find any error in the court’s rejecting of his proffered jury instruction.

  • October 04, 2023

    Portions Of Expert Report In Ohio Copyright Case Will Be Stricken

    CLEVELAND — Although rejecting a copyright owner’s assertion that a defense expert’s rebuttal was untimely, a federal magistrate judge in Ohio on Oct. 3 agreed that the rebuttal makes improper legal arguments about the two-step substantial similarity test employed in the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

  • October 04, 2023

    New Jersey Court Faults Asbestos-Talc Expert Admissions, Topples $224M Award

    NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J. — Given the apparent defects in expert opinions a trial judge improperly admitted three asbestos experts in a talc case without first holding a hearing on whether their methodologies and opinions were reliable, a New Jersey appeals court said Oct. 3 in reversing a $223.8 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson and remanding for a new trial.

  • September 26, 2023

    Judge:  Plaintiffs’ Expert’s Methodology ‘Well-Supported,’ Opinion Is Admissible

    ANN ARBOR, Mich. — A federal judge in Michigan on Sept. 25 denied defendants’ motion to exclude a plaintiffs expert in the litigation related to the lead-contaminated water crisis in the city of Flint, Mich., ruling that the methodology he used is “well-supported” in that he uses sources upon which other experts have relied in the case and uses data derived from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), which included the water lead levels observed during the Flint water crisis.

  • September 26, 2023

    Judge Nixes Deepwater Horizon Case For Expert’s Failure To Meet Daubert Standard

    NEW ORLEANS — A federal judge in Louisiana has dismissed a lawsuit for injuries allegedly caused by exposure to toxins related to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, ruling that the plaintiff’s general causation expert has been rejected repeatedly by other courts under the standard set in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and a second expert proffered by the plaintiff is not a medical doctor.

  • September 22, 2023

    Experts Out, Summary Judgment Granted In Multivitamin Lead Poisoning Case

    CHICAGO — Testimony of causation experts retained by a man who alleges that he developed peripheral neuropathy after taking a multivitamin is inadmissible, and without the testimony, his claims fail, an Illinois federal judge ruled and granted summary judgment to the manufacturer.

  • September 21, 2023

    Florida Panel Reverses Order Denying Insurer’s Motion To Strike Expert Witness

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A Florida appeals panel on Sept. 20 held that a lower court erred in admitting insureds’ expert testimony in a windstorm coverage dispute, reversing an order denying the insurer’s motion to strike the expert witness and remanding for a new trial.

  • September 21, 2023

    Man Appeals Summary Judgment Grant, Expert Exclusion In Gun Design Defect Case

    OKLAHOMA CITY — A man who accidentally shot himself while removing a handgun from its holster filed a notice of appeal to the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals after a district court granted the gun manufacturer summary judgment and excluded his experts, who opined that the accident could have been prevented if the gun had been equipped with a manual safety.

  • September 21, 2023

    Maine Federal Judge OKs Troopers’ Designation As Experts In Civil Rights Case

    PORTLAND, Maine — A Maine federal judge said that a man’s objections to the expert designation of the state troopers he is suing for allegedly violating his civil rights is “understandable” but that the objection is “misplaced.”

  • September 20, 2023

    Health Care Provider Loses Bid To Exclude Causation Expert In Deadly Fall Case

    PHOENIX — An Arizona federal judge on Sept. 19 denied a motion for summary judgment after finding that a causation expert retained by the estate of an elderly woman who died after a fall while in the care of an in-home health aide can testify.

  • September 20, 2023

    Texas Federal Judge Agrees To Limit Expert Testimony In Slip-And-Fall Case

    HOUSTON — A doctor testifying on behalf of a woman who is suing after a fall in a Home Depot store can discuss his diagnosis and treatment plan but cannot opine on causation, a federal judge in Texas ruled.

  • September 20, 2023

    Arizona Federal Judge Rules On Dueling Motions To Exclude In Design Defect Case

    PHOENIX — A federal judge in Arizona has resolved challenges to three experts retained in a lawsuit alleging that a couple were injured when a tire on the recreational vehicle they were traveling in ruptured and the RV burst into flames.

  • September 19, 2023

    Efforts To Bar Experts In Disability Access On New York City Subways Suit Fail

    NEW YORK — A New York federal magistrate judge rejected renewed efforts by New York’s transportation authority to exclude experts retained by a group of disability advocate organizations alleging that the city failed to provide full accessibility to all users of the city’s subway system.

  • September 19, 2023

    Judge: Physician Can Testify On Patient’s Medical Needs But Not Fencing Needs

    KNOXVILLE, Tenn. — A physician who has treated a child with special needs can testify about the child’s “propensity to behave a certain way or do certain things as a result of his special needs” but cannot opine on a type of fence he would require to maintain the child’s safety, a Tennessee federal judge ruled.

  • September 18, 2023

    Expert In Alleged Faulty Knee Implant Case Can Testify, Wash. Federal Judge Rules

    SEATTLE — A federal magistrate judge in Washington on Sept. 15 found that an expert retained by a patient who is suing a medical device manufacturer after a failed knee implant can base his conclusions on the notes of the surgeon and denied the manufacturer’s motion to exclude his testimony.

  • September 18, 2023

    Ga. Federal Judge:  Medical Examiner Can Testify That Taser Caused Man’s Death

    VALDOSTA, Ga. — The manufacturer of a Taser device on Sept. 15 lost its bid to exclude testimony from a medical examiner who opines that the deployment of the weapon was a contributing cause of a man’s death after a federal judge ruled that the testimony was not speculative and would be helpful to a jury.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Daubert archive.