Mealey's Fracking : Mealey's : Legal News & Analysis

Mealey's Fracking

February 07, 2024
Attorneys Debate Authority, Consideration Of Options In Willow Project Approval

SAN FRANCISCO — Attorneys for environmental groups and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) debated before the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals regarding whether the BLM’s approval of the Willow Project, a hydraulic fracturing operation in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, violated the agency’s obligations under federal law. The attorney representing the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) said the BLM is “supposed to look before they leap.”
February 07, 2024
Judge Denies Stay, Says Mineral Rights Holders Would Be ‘Substantially Prejudiced’

CLARKSBURG, W.Va. — A federal judge in West Virginia on Feb. 6 denied a stay in a mineral rights dispute, ruling that the mineral rights holders would be “substantially prejudiced” because it would be another delay in proceedings that have been stalled pending a decision in related litigation.
February 06, 2024
North Dakota: Agencies Are Not Complying With Order For Fracking Lease Information

BISMARCK, N.D. — The state of North Dakota has filed a brief in North Dakota federal court in response to a status report filed by the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), in which the state argues that the DOI and other federal defendants have not complied with the court’s prior orders regarding transparency and the production of documents related to the parties’ dispute over an order that enjoined and restrained the federal agencies from imposing what the state calls “the Stop.” That term refers to the federal agencies’ decision to cancel certain hydraulic fracturing lease sales.
January 31, 2024
Federal Agency Denies Fracking Lease Claims Against It, Says Standing Lacking

WASHINGTON, D.C. — On Jan. 30, the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) filed an answer in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to an amended complaint in a federal hydraulic fracturing lease dispute, denying allegations that it violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and contending that the plaintiffs lack standing to bring their claims.
January 31, 2024
Drilling Companies Deny Claims In Mineral Rights Case, Say Standing Is Lacking

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Drilling companies filed an answer in Ohio federal court on Jan. 30 in a mineral rights dispute, denying claims brought by mineral rights holders who contend that they breached the royalty agreement between the parties. The companies also assert affirmative defenses, including that the action is barred due to lack of standing.
January 31, 2024
Group: EPA’s Approval Of Colorado’s Air Quality Rules Violated Federal Law

DENVER — The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) has filed its opening brief in the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a direct appeal under the Clean Air Act (CAA) related to Colorado’s state implementation plan (SIP) for keeping air pollutants below the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), arguing that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency violated the law in approving the plan. The SIP has particular application with regard to emissions associated with hydraulic fracturing activity.
January 30, 2024
Pennsylvania Agency Announces Fracking Chemical Disclosure Requirements

HARRISBURG, Pa. — The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has announced that it is instituting a new policy under which hydraulic fracturing companies must publicly disclose the chemicals they use in fracking operations earlier in the well development process than has been required previously.
January 30, 2024
Halliburton Defends Patent Board’s Anticipation, Obviousness Determinations

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Substantial evidence supports a final written decision (FWD) by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that technology directed to the automation of hydraulic fracturing processes is unpatentable, Halliburton Energy Systems Inc. maintains in a recent appellee brief filed with the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.
January 29, 2024
Groups: Current Dimensions Of National Monuments Are Needed To Protect Land

DENVER — Conservation advocates and archaeology groups have filed separate amicus curiae briefs in the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals arguing that the current boundaries of the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments, which were reinstated by President Joseph R. Biden Jr., are needed for the proper care and management of the resources in those lands, and the dimensions of the monuments are lawful under the Antiquities Act as it has been interpreted for more than a century.
January 25, 2024
Ohio Court Reverses Injection Well Ruling, Says Takings Claim Is ‘Cognizable’

COLUMBUS, Ohio — The Ohio Supreme Court on Jan. 24 reversed and remanded a lower court and held that a company that disposes of hydraulic fracturing wastewater had stated a legal cognizable interest for a partial taking of its property by a state agency that ordered it to suspend operations at its injection well after it was determined that activity at the well had resulted in earthquakes.
January 24, 2024
In Mineral Rights Case, Judge Nixes Declaratory Judgment Claim As Duplicative

COLUMBUS, Ohio — A federal judge in Ohio has ruled in a mineral rights dispute that the plaintiffs’ claims for breach of contract and declaratory judgment are duplicative because they arise from the same allegations pursuant to the mineral leases at issue. As a result, the judge dismissed the claim for declaratory judgment.
January 24, 2024
Defendant Cites Rule Of Capture In 3-Page Answer To Long-Running Fracking Case

HARRISBURG, Pa. — A hydraulic fracturing operator has filed a short answer in Pennsylvania federal court in a long-running and complex dispute, denying a trespass claim brought by plaintiffs who contend that they continue to be victims of intrusive conduct that results in natural gas being extracted from their land. The fracking company argues that the claims are precluded by the Rule of Capture.
January 22, 2024
High Court Refuses To Consider If Damage Caused By Insured’s Work Is Occurrence

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari on Jan. 22, refusing to consider whether the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals rewrote Pennsylvania insurance law in its application of the faulty workmanship doctrine when it found that damages to natural gas wells caused by an insured’s fracking work does not constitute an occurrence under a commercial general liability policy.
January 18, 2024
Alaska Authority: Agency’s Use Of Lease Terms Still Amounts To Violation Of Law

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A state authority that supports hydraulic fracturing in Alaska filed an amended complaint in the federal fracking lease dispute before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, adding a claim for violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) based on the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) use of the word “license” rather than “lease.” The authority says the DOI’s interpretation of the words is “strained and unsupported” and still amounts to a violation of the APA.
January 17, 2024
High Court Told ‘Chaos’ Will Ensue ‘In A World Without Chevron’ Deference

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court was told Jan. 17 that “chaos” will ensue “in a world without Chevron” deference by government attorneys, who urged it to apply stare decisis and uphold Chevron, which is being challenged in two cases arising out of federal fishing regulations.
January 12, 2024
Wyoming Wants To Strike Extra-Record Materials In Federal Fracking Lease Case

CHEYENNE, Wyo. — The state of Wyoming has filed a reply brief in Wyoming federal court arguing that it should strike and/or exclude extra-record submissions made by the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) in the ongoing battle over the agency’s failure to conduct mineral lease sales for hydraulic fracturing in the third and fourth quarters of 2022. The state says the DOI incorrectly argues that no record exists to review the pause of lease sales.
January 11, 2024
Fracking Proponents Say Federal Lease Case Belongs In Washington, D.C., Not Alaska

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Proponents of hydraulic fracturing in Alaska have filed a brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia federal court contending that their case against the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) and other federal agencies related to allegations that they violated federal law when they terminated fracking leases should not be transferred to Alaska because the DOI made the decision under review in the District of Columbia, not Alaska.
January 11, 2024
Panel Partially Reverses, Says Issue Of Fact Exists Over Unpaid Fracking Royalties

SHREVEPORT, La. — A Louisiana appeals court panel has partially affirmed and partially reversed a ruling in a complex mineral rights dispute, ruling that there was a genuine issue of material fact on a landowner’s claims for unpaid royalties from a gas production company because the company had a continuing economic connection to a gas gathering system that charged costs that did not enhance or increase the market value of the gas.
January 11, 2024
Responding To Earthquakes, Texas Agency Suspends 23 Fracking Disposal Well Permits

AUSTIN, Texas — In response to seven earthquakes that occurred in two Texas counties over a five-week period in late 2023, the Texas Railroad Commission (RRC) has suspended permits for 23 deep disposal wells used to store hydraulic fracturing wastewater.
January 11, 2024
Panel: Royalties Should Be Allocated Proportionately To Mineral Interest Owners

EL PASO, Texas — A Texas appellate panel has reversed and remanded a trial court’s decision, ruling that the burden of the state’s nonparticipating royalty interest (NPRI) in hydraulic fracturing operations is to be allocated proportionately to all mineral interest owners in accordance with their respective interests.
January 10, 2024
Groups Tell 10th Circuit National Monuments Decision Should Stand

DENVER — Environmental advocates and Native American groups filed response briefs in the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Jan. 9 in the litigation over President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s decision to reinstate the original dimensions of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments under the Antiquities Act. The environmental groups contend that the court should affirm the trial court’s holding that Biden had the authority to make the decision, and the Native American groups say the parties challenging it lack standing.
January 10, 2024
Judge Says Stockholders Failed To State A Claim Against Fracking Company

HOUSTON — A federal judge in Texas has dismissed a securities lawsuit brought by shareholders against a hydraulic fracturing operator, finding that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim or satisfy the federal rules of procedure in connection with their claims that the directors and officers of the company knowingly made false statements about their activities.
January 10, 2024
Panel Sends Oilfield Accident Case Back To Trial Court For Ruling On Timeliness

LAKE CHARLES, La. — A Louisiana state appeals court has remanded to a trial court an oilfield accident lawsuit as the defendant, who lost a total of $3,755,956.23 in damages, seeks a hearing on the issue of whether the plaintiff failed to file the lawsuit in a timely manner.
January 09, 2024
Judge Allows Amended Fracking Securities Complaint, Denies Bid To File Under Seal

HOUSTON — A federal judge in Texas on Jan. 8 issued two rulings in a shareholder lawsuit against a hydraulic fracturing operator and three of its senior executives, granting the plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint but denying their request to file it under seal. The judge ruled that the shareholders can add claims for misrepresentation but that they failed to explain why the public’s right to access is outweighed by the parties’ interest in sealing the amended complaint.
January 08, 2024
Judge: Landowners’ Continuing Trespass Case Against Fracking Operator Is Valid

HARRISBURG, Pa. — A federal judge in Pennsylvania has denied a hydraulic fracturing company’s attempt to dismiss a lawsuit against it, ruling that the plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged a continuing trespass and have shown that they continue to be alleged victims of intrusive conduct that results in natural gas being extracted from their land.