Mealey's Franchise
-
April 30, 2024
HomeServices To Settle Commissions Claims On Heels Of NAR $418M Agreement
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The deadlines and proceedings in a real estate commission conspiracy class lawsuit in a federal court in Missouri that are related to HomeServices of America Inc., BHH Affiliates and HSF Affiliates LLC (together, HomeServices) were stayed in an April 29 docket entry, one business day after HomeServices filed a notice of pending settlement and joint motion to stay; HomeServices’ settlement announcement came three days after a $418 million settlement by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) was preliminarily approved.
-
April 29, 2024
High Court Won’t Decide ‘Average’ Class Damages Issue In Chili’s Data Breach Suit
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A question about the propriety of using an “average” damages amount suggested by the plaintiffs’ damages expert to certify a class will go unheard by the U.S. Supreme Court, which in its April 29 order list denied a petition for certiorari by the owner of the Chili’s restaurant chain, which protested the possibility that customers who suffered no damages at all in a 2018 data breach would still receive these damages awards.
-
April 25, 2024
PPP Borrower Appeals SBA Denial Of Loan Forgiveness Based On Initial Ineligibility
AMARILLO, Texas — In a lawsuit brought by a truck dealer against the federal government challenging the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) determination that the dealer was not initially eligible for a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan and thus ineligible for loan forgiveness, the truck dealer on April 24 filed a notice of appeal to the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals of a Texas federal judge’s rulings upholding the SBA’s decision and denying the dealer’s motion to alter or amend the opinion.
-
April 22, 2024
U.S. High Court Denies Domino’s FAA Petition In Truck Drivers’ Expenses Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on April 22 denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Domino’s Pizza LLC after the company’s truck drivers (D&S drivers) were found by the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in their class case alleging unreimbursed business expenses and violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).
-
April 17, 2024
Centralization Of Cases Challenging Real Estate Commissions Denied By JPMDL
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPMDL) declined to centralize nine cases pending in seven districts brought on behalf of classes of home sellers alleging that rules governing buyer broker compensation violate antitrust laws, opining that pending nationwide class settlements in another case may resolve some of the claims in the nine cases.
-
April 17, 2024
Jack In The Box Workers Partially Awarded Attorney Fees, Costs In Wage Suit
PORTLAND, Ore. — Motions for attorney fees and costs by both sides in a wage-and-hour suit brought by a class of Jack in the Box Inc. workers who saw some success with their claims were partially granted and partially denied by a federal judge in Oregon who ruled that the workers were entitled to a portion of the attorney fees and costs they sought and that the employer was entitled to no attorney fees but was entitled to a portion of the amount it sought for witness fees and other costs.
-
April 15, 2024
U.S. High Court Denies Petition In Real Estate Commissions Class Suit
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on April 15 denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by a real estate franchisor sued as part of an antitrust class action by home sellers over commission and asking the justices to decide whether a court or an arbitrator should decide a question of arbitrability.
-
April 04, 2024
1 Arbitration Motion Deemed Withdrawn In Commission Case After Settlement
CHICAGO — A federal judge in Illinois ruled that one motion to compel arbitration by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and three real estate franchisors in a class lawsuit over broker commissions was voluntarily withdrawn and terminated but that two others remain live following the filing of the parties’ joint status report requested by the judge after NAR announced that it will resolve nationwide claims for $418 million.
-
March 22, 2024
Commission Case Parties Asked If Arbitration Motions Remain Live After Settlement
CHICAGO — Parties in a class lawsuit over broker commissions were asked March 21 by a federal judge in Illinois to address whether several pending motions for arbitration filed by real estate franchisors remain live after the National Association of Realtors (NAR) announced nearly a week earlier that it would resolve nationwide claims for $418 million.
-
March 21, 2024
6th Circuit Vacates, Remands 2 Pizza Delivery Driver Suits On Calculating Costs
CINCINNATI — A trial court that found that pizza delivery drivers should be reimbursed for their costs using a mileage rate published by the IRS and a trial court that found in a different case that pizza delivery drivers’ employers could reimburse drivers for their costs with a “reasonable approximation” both erred, a Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled, vacating both decisions and remanding for the courts to consider the appropriate regime to use given the difficulty of proof.
-
March 19, 2024
U.S. Supreme Court Denies McDonald’s Petition In No-Poach Appeal
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on March 18 denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by McDonald’s USA LLC and McDonald’s Corp. (together, McDonald’s) after a Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held that the no longer enforced no-hire agreement between the fast food franchisor and its franchisees might violate antitrust laws.
-
March 06, 2024
English Justice Denies Summary Judgment As To Coverage Issue In COVID-19 Suit
LONDON — A justice of the High Court of England and Wales denied summary judgment to two restaurant chains on the issue of coverage for their business interruption losses arising from the coronavirus pandemic but granted summary judgment and permission to appeal the policy construction issue.
-
March 05, 2024
Franchisees Seek Final Approval Of $30M Classification Settlement With Jan-Pro
SAN FRANCISCO — California cleaning franchisees who sued Jan-Pro Franchising International Inc. alleging misclassification as independent contractors filed a motion in a federal court in California seeking final approval of a class settlement under which the franchisor will pay $30 million and make changes to its business practices.
-
February 28, 2024
Judge: SBA Properly Denied Loan Forgiveness To PPP Borrower Not Initially Eligible
AMARILLO, Texas — In a lawsuit brought by a truck dealer against the federal government challenging the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) determination that the dealer was not initially eligible for a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan and thus ineligible for loan forgiveness, a Texas federal judge on Feb. 27 denied the dealer’s motion to alter or amend his opinion upholding the SBA’s decisions, ruling that the SBA’s loan review process “protects taxpayers from footing the bill for loans issued to ineligible parties” and that the SBA was authorized to enact that process.
-
February 26, 2024
Claims, Defendants Partially Dismissed In Homebuyers’ Commission Class Case
CHICAGO — A federal judge in Illinois partially granted motions to dismiss filed by a real estate brokers trade association and real estate franchisors in a putative class complaint by homebuyers who accuse the defendants of conspiring over commission rates, resulting in homebuyers paying artificially inflated prices for residential real estate because a portion of the supracompetitive rates is incorporated into the sales price of homes.
-
February 15, 2024
Bid For Reconsideration On Third-Party Implied Indemnity Claim Is Disputed
JACKSON, Miss. — Domino’s Pizza LLC and related entities are seeking reconsideration of a ruling that a third-party claim for implied indemnity survives dismissal in a dispute involving a franchisee and commutation of reinsurance, and in an opposition brief, third-party plaintiffs tell a Mississippi federal court that this case differs from two the Domino’s entities cited.
-
February 14, 2024
Reconsideration Of Partial Dismissal Of Website Data Collection Claims Sought
SAN DIEGO — Papa John’s International Inc. filed a motion for reconsideration in a federal court in California after a judge partially granted its motion to dismiss a putative class complaint alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) through the alleged interception and collection of users’ data on a pizza-ordering webpage, in light of the ruling in Briskin v. Shopify.
-
February 14, 2024
Real Estate Broker Franchisor Asks High Court To Decide Who Decides Arbitrability
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A real estate franchisor sued as part of an antitrust class action by home sellers over commission rules filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court asking the justices to decide whether a court or an arbitrator should decide a question of arbitrability.
-
February 12, 2024
McDonald’s Workers Say U.S. High Court Need Not Weigh In On No-Poach Dispute
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals decision holding that the no longer enforced no-hire agreement between a fast food franchisor and its franchisees might violate antitrust laws is “unremarkable” and “does not merit” review by the U.S. Supreme Court, McDonald’s workers argue in a Feb. 9 opposition to a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by McDonald’s USA LLC and McDonald’s Corp. (together, McDonald’s).
-
February 05, 2024
Keller Williams’ $70M Pact In Sellers’ Commissions Case Preliminarily Approved
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A $70 million settlement proposed by Keller Williams Realty Inc. in a class case by home sellers in which a federal jury in Missouri found that the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and real estate franchisors engaged in a commission conspiracy in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act was granted preliminary approval by a federal judge in Missouri; on the same day, a joint motion to stay in light of the settlement was filed in a parallel action in a federal court in Illinois.
-
January 29, 2024
Burger King Franchisee Seeks Coverage For Suit Alleging BIPA Violations
CHICAGO — A franchisee of the Burger King chain sued its umbrella insurer in Illinois federal court for breach of contract, seeking a declaration that the insurer has a duty to defend it against an underlying putative class lawsuit alleging that it violated the Illinois Biometric Information Protection Act (BIPA).
-
January 29, 2024
7-Eleven To Mass. High Court: Franchisees Don’t Perform Services For Franchisor
BOSTON — Addressing the most recent question certified to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court by the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in an employment classification case, 7-Eleven Inc. argues in its brief that its franchisees do not trigger the Massachusetts test for independent contractor misclassification, also known as the “ABC” test, as their contractual obligations, including paying a percentage of their profit to the franchisor, do not constitute “services” under that test.
-
January 25, 2024
Judge Rejects Pizza Chain’s Bid To Ditch Third-Party Implied Indemnity Claim
JACKSON, Miss. — A third-party “claim for implied indemnity” against Domino’s Pizza LLC and related entities remains after a Mississippi federal judge otherwise dismissed a third-party complaint in the dispute involving a franchisee and commutation of reinsurance.
-
January 23, 2024
Federal Judge Refuses To Dismiss 7-Eleven’s Bodily Injury Coverage Lawsuit
MIAMI — A federal judge in Florida denied insurers’ motion to dismiss a 7-Eleven store’s declaratory judgment lawsuit seeking general liability and liquor liability coverage for a customer’s underlying bodily injury action alleging that a 7-Eleven employee physically struck him numerous times, concluding that the insured has adequately pleaded “a bona fide dispute” to survive dismissal.
-
January 18, 2024
Partial Dismissal Granted In Class Suit Over Papa John’s Website Data Collection
SAN DIEGO — A federal judge in California partially granted a pizza franchisor’s motion to dismiss a putative class complaint alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) through the alleged interception and collection of users’ data on a pizza ordering webpage, finding that the lead plaintiff failed to show that there were telephone communications at issue or that there was an imminent threat of harm in the future.