Mealey's Insurance
-
June 28, 2024
Citing Spizzirri, Insurer Asks 7th Circuit To Dismiss Appeal In Arbitration Estoppel Row
CHICAGO — Arguing that Smith v. Spizzirri renders deficient “the basis for this Court’s appellate jurisdiction,” an insurer filed a June 27 motion in the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to dismiss reinsurers’ fully briefed appeal concerning the effects of prior arbitration involving asbestos-related liabilities.
-
June 26, 2024
D.C. Circuit Reverses Ruling In Insurers’ Favor In Dispute Over Condensation Damage
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of builders risk insurers in a real estate developer and contractor’s lawsuit seeking coverage for remediation of condensation damage, finding that the policies provide coverage because the ensuing-loss clause applies to losses from water damage that was caused by the excluded perils of dampness and temperature changes.
-
June 26, 2024
2 Stipulated Dismissals Granted In Insurer’s Suit Over Asbestos Liabilities Row
OMAHA, Neb. — Two defendants referred to as reinsurers in a suit National Indemnity Co. (NICO) filed over a $157.2 million settlement it reached with Montana regarding alleged asbestos exposures have been dismissed with prejudice under a joint stipulation that a Nebraska federal judge granted June 24.
-
June 26, 2024
Special Discovery Master Does In Camera Review In Indemnification Case
TRENTON, N.J. — Following in camera review in New Jersey federal court in a dispute between insurers and reinsurers over indemnification for asbestos bodily injury claims, a special discovery master directed insurers to produce all or part of roughly two-thirds of the sample documents he considered.
-
June 25, 2024
Policy Exclusions Do Not Bar Coverage For Decomposing Body, Ohio Judge Says
CANTON, Ohio — An Ohio judge found that coverage is owed for damages to a rental property caused by a decomposing human body because the policies’ pollution exclusion, virus exclusion and infestation exclusion do not clearly bar coverage for the insureds’ property damage claim.
-
June 24, 2024
District Court’s Collapse Ruling Must Be Reversed, Contractor Tells 6th Circuit
CINCINNATI — A federal judge erred in finding that no coverage is owed for a structurally unsound wall that remained standing after a portion of the wall collapsed during a building renovation because the lower court failed to apply Tennessee law in construing the meaning of the term collapse in the insurer’s policy, a building contractor says in its June 21 appellant brief filed in the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.
-
June 24, 2024
Water Exclusion Bars Coverage For Water Damages In Insureds’ Basement, Panel Says
NEW ORLEANS — A federal district court properly entered summary judgment in favor of a homeowners insurer on breach of contract and bad faith claims because coverage for water damages to the insureds’ basement is excluded pursuant to a water exclusion in the homeowners’ policy, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said.
-
June 20, 2024
6th Circuit Appeal Filed Over Reinsurer’s Collateral Estoppel Win In Defense Row
CINCINNATI — A defense costs dispute concerning asbestos lawsuits and prior arbitration is going to the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, with an insurer filing a notice of appeal regarding a Michigan federal judge’s ruling that collateral estoppel applies.
-
June 19, 2024
California High Court Reverses, Says Vertical Exhaustion Applies To Policies
SAN FRANCISCO — The California Supreme Court reversed an appeals court’s ruling in a long-running asbestos insurance coverage dispute after determining that a vertical exhaustion method, rather than a horizontal exhaustion method, must be applied to excess policies that sit over an insured’s primary policies because the language of the excess policies and the insured’s reasonable expectations support a vertical exhaustion method.
-
June 19, 2024
Illinois Panel Says No Coverage Owed For Carbon Monoxide Suits Filed Against Insured
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — No coverage is owed for underlying personal injury lawsuits stemming from a carbon monoxide leak because the underlying allegations involve the insured’s rendering of professional services, the Fourth District Illinois Appellate Court said June 18 in finding that the policies’ professional services exclusion bars coverage.
-
June 18, 2024
Insurer Says No Coverage Owed For Suit Stemming From Insured’s Fertilizer Plant
TYLER, Texas — An insurer filed suit in Texas federal court against its insured, seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured for an underlying suit arising out of the insured’s operation of a fertilizer plant because the insured failed to timely notify the insurer of the suit and because the policies’ pollution exclusion bars coverage.
-
June 18, 2024
Insured Building Owner Says Lower Court Misinterpreted Policy’s Collapse Language
CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeal must reverse a district court’s ruling entered in favor of an insurer because the lower court failed to properly interpret and apply the language of the policy regarding the coverage afforded for the collapse of a wall, an insured building owner says in its June 17 appellant brief.
-
June 18, 2024
Insurer Urges N.Y. Federal Judge To Allow Interlocutory Appeal To 2nd Circuit
NEW YORK — A commercial lines insurer reiterates in a reply brief filed in New York federal court that an interlocutory appeal of a New York federal judge’s ruling to the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals is warranted because the issue of whether a communicable disease exclusion bars coverage for three underlying lawsuits alleging that residents of the insured properties contracted Legionnaires’ disease presents a controlling question of law and an immediate appeal could result in the dismissal of all the claims.
-
June 13, 2024
Magistrate: Defendant CGL Insurer Owes Defense For Negligence Suit Against Insured
FRESNO, Calif. — A federal magistrate judge in California held that underlying allegations that an insured negligently conducted cyclic steaming operations constitute an “occurrence” under a defendant commercial general liability insurer’s policy, granting the plaintiff CGL insurer’s joint motion for summary judgment as to the defendant insurer’s duty to defend against an underlying lawsuit brought against their mutual insured.
-
June 13, 2024
Dismissal Of Bad Faith Claim Denied In Estate Row With Insurer Over ‘Total Loss’
SCRANTON, Pa. — A Pennsylvania federal judge on June 12 denied a homeowners insurer’s motion to dismiss a bad faith claim in a suit filed against it by the estate of a woman alleging that the insurer’s failure to pay a claim for water damage resulted in the property being “a total loss,” finding dismissal inappropriate at this point in the litigation.
-
June 13, 2024
Failure To Timely Submit Proof-Of-Loss Forms Is Fatal To Insured’s Bad Faith Suit
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — A New York federal judge granted a homeowners insurer’s motion for summary judgment after determining that the insured’s breach of contract and bad faith suit cannot proceed because the insured failed to submit proof-of-loss statements regarding the water damage in his home within 60 days as required by the policy.
-
June 11, 2024
Insurer Ordered To Produce Documents Related To Occupational Disease Claims
PITTSBURGH — A Pennsylvania federal judge ordered an insurer to produce claims manuals, guidelines and policies related to the insurer’s evaluation of occupational disease and employer liability claims because the documents, requested by the insured, are relevant to the insurer’s handling of the insured’s claim for coverage for an underlying asbestos bodily injury claim.
-
June 11, 2024
Environmental Contamination Coverage Suit Transferred From Alabama To Georgia
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — An environmental contamination coverage suit filed by a number of insurers against their insured must be transferred to Georgia federal court because almost all of the events giving rise to the contamination at issue occurred in Georgia and the plaintiff insurers will not be inconvenienced by the transfer, an Alabama federal judge said in granting the insured’s motion to transfer to the suit to Georgia federal court.
-
June 10, 2024
Insureds Urge 8th Circuit To Find Pollution Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage
ST. LOUIS — A pollution exclusion does not bar coverage for an underlying bodily injury claim stemming from carbon monoxide exposure because the pollution exclusion applies only to traditional environmental pollution claims, the insureds claim in their appellant reply brief filed in the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.
-
June 10, 2024
Coverage Excluded For Child’s Injury Caused By Chemical In Mints, Insurer Says
ST. LOUIS — No coverage is owed to insureds for an underlying suit seeking damages caused by a child’s ingestion of liquid breath mints that contained a chemical that damaged the child’s esophagus because the policy’s pollution exclusion applies as a bar to coverage, an insurer says in a complaint filed in Missouri federal court.
-
June 10, 2024
Indiana Federal Court Lacks Personal Jurisdiction Over Insurers In CERCLA Case
SOUTH BEND, Ind. — Due to a lack of personal jurisdiction, an Indiana federal judge denied a motion to bar contribution claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act against a group of insurance companies that allegedly sold policies to a company that polluted an industrial site with hazardous substances because there is no case or controversy involving the insurers.
-
June 10, 2024
Choice-Of-Law Ruling In Environmental Coverage Dispute Certified For Appeal
EAST ST. LOUIS, Ill. — An Illinois federal judge granted a motion to certify a choice-of-law ruling for interlocutory appeal to the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals after determining that resolution of the issue could help to advance litigation of the environmental contamination coverage suit.
-
June 06, 2024
Supreme Court Reverses, Says Asbestos Debtor’s Insurer Can Challenge Reorganization
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Because the primary insurer of Chapter 11 asbestos debtors Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc. and Hanson Permanente Cement Inc. is on the hook for most of the debtors’ asbestos liabilities under their reorganization plan, it is a party in interest that has standing to object to the plan, the U.S. Supreme Court held June 6 in a unanimous decision.
-
June 05, 2024
Coblentz Settlement Cannot Be Enforced Against Excess Insurers, 11th Circuit Affirms
ATLANTA — The 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of excess insurers in an insured’s lawsuit seeking to enforce a Coblentz v. Am.Sur. Co. of N.Y. settlement agreement arising from an underlying negligence action, finding that the excess insurers did not breach their duty to defend because they offered to defend under a reservation of rights.
-
June 04, 2024
Civil Conspiracy Claim In Mold Coverage Suit Cannot Proceed, Magistrate Judge Says
CHICAGO — An Illinois federal magistrate judge dismissed a civil conspiracy claim alleged by insureds against their homeowners insurer and the insurer’s preferred mold remediation company after determining that the insureds failed to show that there was any agreement between the insurer and the mold remediation company.