Mealey's Pollution Liability : Mealey's : Legal News & Analysis

Mealey's Pollution Liability

August 03, 2023
Calif. Federal Judge Refuses To Dismiss Third-Party Claims Of PCE Contamination

SANTA ANA, Calif. — The former operator of a dry-cleaning business sufficiently pleaded its third-party claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and California law because it explained where and how hazardous substances migrated from a nearby property onto its own, a California federal judge found in denying a motion to dismiss filed by three third-party defendants.
August 02, 2023
State Agencies Were Not Operators Under CERCLA, California Federal Judge Says

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Two California agencies that oversaw the remediation of a contaminated former wood preserving facility were not operators under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act because the counterclaims brought against them by a group of intervening insurers contained no allegations that the agencies controlled the facility while hazardous substances were being released, a California federal judge held in granting the agencies’ motion to dismiss.
August 02, 2023
Briefly: Pipeline Companies To Pay $12.5M In Penalties For 2 Oil Spills

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced that it has reached a consent agreement with two pipeline companies under which they will pay a combined $12.5 million in civil penalties for violating safety laws and the Clean Water Act (CWA) in connection with oil spills in Montana and North Dakota.
August 01, 2023
Panel Affirms Ruling In Favor Of Insurer In Pollution Suit On Duty To Defend Issue

NEW ORLEANS — No coverage is afforded for an underlying suit against an insured alleging that the insured’s junkyard operations polluted stormwater runoff because the policies’ pollution exclusion bars coverage for the underlying allegations, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeal said July 31 in affirming a district court’s ruling.
July 31, 2023
11th Circuit Won’t Reconsider Diligent Prosecution Bar Holding in CWA Dispute

ATLANTA — An 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeal panel on July 28 denied a petition for hearing of its previous opinion where it found that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Georgia Department of Resources (GDNR) were diligently prosecuting a prior consent decree resolving Clean Water Act (CWA) violations by DeKalb County to such a degree that a citizen suit alleging similar violations for the discharge of untreated sewage was barred.
July 31, 2023
1st Circuit Approves EPA’s Permit For Cleanup Of PCBs In Housatonic River

BOSTON — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in issuing a permit for the cleanup of New England’s Housatonic River because the agency adequately considered alternative remediation methods and public comments, a First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held in denying two environmental groups’ petition for review of the permit.
July 28, 2023
6th Circuit Refuses To Transfer Kentucky’s Challenge To EPA Air Quality Decision

CINCINNATI — The District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals does not have exclusive jurisdiction over Kentucky’s and a state agency’s petitions for judicial review of a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency decision to partly disapprove Kentucky’s state implementation plan (SIP) under the Clean Air Act (CAA) because the decision is only locally or regionally applicable, a majority of a Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held in denying the EPA’s motions to transfer in both cases.
July 27, 2023
D.C. Circuit Denies Petition To Review Definition Of ‘Corrosive’ Within RCRA

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s decision not to amend its definition of “corrosive” for the purposes of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) was not arbitrary and capricious, a District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held in denying a petition filed by an environmental group challenging the definition because the group’s arguments were either untimely or not compelling enough to overcome the panel’s deference to the EPA.
July 25, 2023
N.C. Federal Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motion In Wastewater Contamination Row

STATESVILLE, N.C. — An adhesive manufacturer’s Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act claims survive a motion for summary judgment filed by a company accused of transporting wastewater totes that later leaked because the manufacturer provided evidence that directly contradicted the company’s motion, a North Carolina federal judge found in denying the motion.
July 21, 2023
Calif. Federal Judge Dismisses Third-Party Claims In Airport Pollution Dispute

LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge dismissed without prejudice third-party claims brought by a company accused of violating the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) by contaminating an airport with hazardous substances because the chain of corporate history alleged by the company was not accurate.
July 20, 2023
Question Of Fact Exists Over Claims That Tennessee City Polluted Nearby Creek

COLUMBIA, Tenn. — A “true question of fact” exists about whether a Tennessee city and its utilities board violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) by discharging pollutants from its sewer management system into the nearby Shoal Creek, a Tennessee federal judge held in denying a plaintiff-environmental groups’ motion for summary judgment.
July 18, 2023
2nd Circuit Affirms, Finds Removal Of Love Canal Claims Was Untimely

NEW YORK — A group of state entities and companies that were involved in the cleanup of a former waste disposal site near an unused canal under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act failed to timely remove 19 cases brought by individuals who live near the site and allegedly suffer health problems as a result of the contamination at the site, a majority of a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in affirming the remand of the cases to state court.
July 17, 2023
Following 6th Circuit’s Lead, Federal Judge Dismisses 2 Car Emissions Disputes

BAY CITY, Mich. — In light of a recent Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals opinion, a Michigan federal judge dismissed with prejudice two similar cases, finding that the Clean Air Act (CAA) preempted claims filed by two classes of automobile owners who alleged that defeat devices in their vehicles allowed the manufacturers to deceive the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and violate vehicle-emissions standards.
July 17, 2023
2nd Circuit: Property Owners Sufficiently Pleaded Most Of Their RCRA Claims

NEW YORK — A Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel vacated most of a trial court’s decision to dismiss Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) claims brought against companies that are alleged to have disposed of radioactive waste onto nearby properties because the plaintiff-property owners sufficiently pleaded their claims.
July 17, 2023
Panel Reverses, Says Insurers Have Duty To Defend Seller Of Contaminated Land

LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel ruled that a trial court erred by granting summary adjudication in favor of two insurers on the duty to defend a lawsuit against an insured for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws due to ongoing groundwater contamination at an industrial property it sold in 1995.
July 14, 2023
Federal Judge: Contamination Claims Are Supported By Proper Expert Testimony

SAN DIEGO — Genuine issues of material fact exist about public nuisance and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) claims brought by a property developer against a recycling company for the company’s alleged contamination of groundwater near a new development because the claims are supported by admissible expert testimony, a California federal judge found in denying the recycling company’s motion for summary judgment.
July 12, 2023
Minnesota Panel: Court Erred In Finding Amish Community Discharged Polluted Water

SAINT PAUL, Minn. — A trial court erred in finding that a county ordinance requiring members of the local Amish community to maintain septic tanks for the purposes of disposing of household water was the least restrictive means of maintaining a compelling state interest of protecting local water from contamination because the evidence relied upon by the court was speculative on several issues, including whether the water was polluted, a Minnesota Court of Appeals panel held in reversing and remanding the trial court’s judgment.
July 12, 2023
EPA Says Norfolk Southern’s Affirmative Defenses Fail In Train Derailment Case

YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has filed a brief in Ohio federal court supporting a motion to strike certain affirmative defenses raised by Norfolk Southern Corp. in the consolidated lawsuits brought by the state of Ohio and the U.S. government related to injuries from the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, arguing that Norfolk Southern is not entitled to relief under a “failure to mitigate” defense because the U.S. government has no duty to mitigate Norfolk Southern’s damages under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
July 12, 2023
Clean Water Act Claims Dismissed As Shotgun Pleadings By Washington Federal Judge

TACOMA, Wash. — A Washington federal judge dismissed Clean Water Act (CWA) claims brought by an environmental group against a company for alleged environmental permit violations at a storage facility as shotgun pleadings because the group’s complaint was not detailed enough to allow the judge to determine whether the company was liable for the allegations.
July 12, 2023
Landowner Violated Clean Water Act By Filling Wetlands, Conn. Federal Judge Finds

NEW HAVEN, Conn. — A landowner violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) by filling in protected wetlands on his property without a permit and after having received several warnings and notices from various federal agencies, a Connecticut federal judge found in granting the United States’ motion for summary judgment on its CWA claims against the landowner.
July 12, 2023
Georgia Federal Judge Allows Landowners To Amend Clean Water Act Claims

ATHENS, Ga. — In granting a motion to amend a Clean Water Act (CWA) claim brought by two landowners who allege that several parties involved in the transportation and dumping of red clay caused polluted stormwater to enter a stream and ponds, a Georgia federal judge opined that the landowners’ motion was not filed with undue delay.
July 10, 2023
No Coverage Owed For Contamination Caused By Release Of Petroleum

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — No coverage is owed to an insured for contamination cleanup costs caused by the release of petroleum and other contaminants from an underground storage tank at a gas station because the insured failed to notify its insurer within seven days of learning of the presence of the contaminants in the groundwater as required by the policy, a Florida federal judge said in granting the insurer’s motion for summary judgment.
July 07, 2023
N.J. High Court Refuses To Review Ruling In Environmental Contamination Suit

TRENTON, N.J. — The New Jersey Supreme Court denied an insured’s petition for certification, refusing to review the New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division’s ruling that a prior or pending litigation exclusion bars coverage for an environmental contamination lawsuit filed against the insured by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP).
July 06, 2023
D.C. Circuit: EPA’s Rule On Aircraft Emissions Was Not Arbitrary And Capricious

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to align aircraft emission standards with the standards of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) did not violate the Clean Air Act (CAA) and was not arbitrary and capricious because the agency has “substantial discretion” to regulate aircraft emissions, a District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in denying two petitions for review filed by a groups of states and the District of Columbia as well as three environmental organizations.
July 06, 2023
Question Of Fact Exists Over Basement Oil Spill, New York Panel Concludes

BROOKLYN, N.Y. — A homeowner is not entitled to summary judgment on his claims for strict liability against an oil company whose employee allegedly caused an oil spill in the basement of the plaintiff’s home because there is a triable issue of fact as to whether the homeowner contributed to the spill by failing to turn off his heating system after discovering the spill, a New York appellate panel found on July 5 in affirming denial of the homeowner’s summary judgment motion.