Mealey's Securities

  • August 22, 2024

    9th Circuit: Shareholders Of Electric Vehicle Maker Lack Standing For Claims

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a California federal judge’s decision to dismiss a putative class complaint brought by investors alleging that an electric car company and the special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) that acquired it misled investors; unlike the judge who dismissed on the claims on their merits, though, the panel held that the investors lacked standing to bring their claims in the first place.

  • August 22, 2024

    Amici Tell High Court 9th Circuit’s Falsity Ruling Could Damage Financial Industry

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Digital Chamber filed one of four amicus curiae briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court in support of a computer manufacturer and its CEO, arguing that a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals finding that plaintiff retirement funds could rely on expert testimony to support their claims of security fraud under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) could have potentially disastrous effects, particularly in the cryptocurrency space.

  • August 20, 2024

    2nd Circuit: Recent High Court Finding Narrowly Affects Securities Suit

    NEW YORK — The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 19 remanded to a New York federal court a securities dispute brought by investors who said an infrastructure company made misleading claims to investors, holding that a recent ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court stemming from the case only narrowly impacts the Second Circuit’s previous findings.

  • August 20, 2024

    Hedge Fund Manager Appeals Finding Of No Attorney Fees In SEC Enforcement

    BOSTON — A hedge fund manager and his funds have appealed to the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a Massachusetts federal judge’s holding that they are not entitled to attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) after partially prevailing on claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission because the SEC’s initial position was substantially justified.

  • August 19, 2024

    D.C. Circuit: No Award To Whistleblowing Lawyer Who Tipped Client To SEC

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A panel of judges in the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the Security and Exchange Commission’s decision to deny a whistleblower award to a company’s in-house attorney whose tip led to SEC enforcement action against the company and certain of its executives, with the panel holding in a June opinion that was unsealed Aug. 16 that the attorney’s tip was not made to serve his client’s interests.

  • August 19, 2024

    Delaware High Court Affirms Attorney Fees in $1B Dell Securities Settlement

    WILMINGTON, Del. — A unanimous Delaware Supreme Court upheld a vice chancellor’s award of $266.7 million in attorney fees to counsel for the lead plaintiff in a complaint brought by investors alleging that Dell Technologies Inc., certain of its controlling stockholders and directors, and its financial adviser breached their fiduciary duty by engaging in a stock swap that resulted in significant losses to investors, holding that the vice chancellor did not abuse his discretion in setting the award.

  • August 15, 2024

    Judge Rules Missouri’s ESG Factor Rules Preempted, Grants Permanent Injunction

    JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Ruling against state officials on all claims, a Missouri federal judge on Aug. 14 granted summary judgment for a trade association and entered a statewide permanent injunction barring enforcement of two new Missouri rules the association said require “a state-authored script” for “incorporating a social or nonfinancial objective into investment advice.”

  • August 15, 2024

    Amici Decry Discovery Ruling In FirstEnergy Bribery Securities Case

    CINCINNATI — A coalition of 39 law firms was one of four groups to file amicus curiae briefs in the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in support of an energy company’s petition for a writ of mandamus, echoing the company’s argument that an Ohio federal judge inappropriately ruled that internal investigation reports about the company’s bribes to an Ohio state representative were not subject to attorney-client privilege in a securities complaint stemming from the bribery; the law firms say the ruling has the potential to severely damage companies’ ability to perform internal investigations.

  • August 14, 2024

    Patent Attorney Urges High Court To Decline Review Of 9th Circuit FCA Reversal

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A patent attorney who was a district court’s qui tam plaintiff in a suit accusing pharmaceutical companies of violating the False Claims Act (FCA) by artificially inflating drug prices urges the U.S. Supreme Court to decline review of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling reversing the district court’s dismissal, arguing that the Ninth Circuit correctly “held that the public disclosures did not collectively disclose the fraud.”

  • August 14, 2024

    NVIDIA Tells High Court Pension Funds’ Securities Suit ‘Flunks’ Scienter Test

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A computer manufacturer and its CEO tell the U.S. Supreme Court in their Aug. 13 opening brief that the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals enlarged a split over the legal standard for alleging scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) by allowing retirement funds to rely on the findings of experts to show falsity.

  • August 14, 2024

    9th Circuit Partly Revives Investor’s Price-Fixing Claim Against Crypto Outfits

    SAN FRANCISCO — A panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals partially revived a putative class complaint brought by an investor against several cryptocurrency companies, alleging that they conspired to deflate the value of a crypto asset, holding that an Arizona federal judge erred in holding that the investor failed to establish personal jurisdiction regarding the crypto companies.

  • August 13, 2024

    5th Circuit: Litigation Bar Against Liquidators Of Ponzi Assets Was Inappropriate

    NEW ORLEANS — A federal judge in Texas lacked personal jurisdiction to bar two liquidators who were appointed by an Antiguan court to collect assets related to a massive Ponzi scheme from bringing any future claims related to the scheme against a Swiss bank that reached a settlement with the receiver appointed in the United States to also oversee Ponzi assets, a split panel of judges in the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held.

  • August 12, 2024

    Facebook To High Court: Risk Disclosure Statements Weren’t Misleading

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The social media giant formerly known as Facebook Inc. told the U.S. Supreme Court in an Aug. 9 brief that the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals erred when it held that the company issued misleading statements about the risk of potential misuse of user data because the company was aware that it had already occurred; Facebook argues that it disclosed all information required under federal securities laws.

  • August 12, 2024

    Briefly: Some Claims May Proceed In Securities Fraud Case About Pipeline

    PHILADELPHIA — A federal judge in Pennsylvania has ruled in a long and winding securities fraud class action related to the construction of a hydraulic fracturing pipeline that only claims brought by shareholders that are based on corrective disclosures made by the pipeline company in August 2018 may proceed.

  • August 09, 2024

    Magistrate Judge: Crypto Exchange Not Subject To U.S. Securities Laws

    AUSTIN, Texas — A federal magistrate judge in Texas recommended that a putative class complaint brought by investors who say an online crypto asset exchange and its organizers misled them by saying their investment was risk free should be dismissed without prejudice, writing that the complaint should proceed in an Israeli court because the crypto organization is registered as an entity in Israel and lacked sufficient contact with the United States.

  • August 09, 2024

    Judge Tosses Most Claims In Shareholder Derivative Suit Against Formula Maker

    CHICAGO — A federal judge in Illinois dismissed without prejudice multiple claims brought by investors in a shareholder derivative complaint against a food company whose shutdown of a plant contributed to a national shortage of baby formula, holding that the investors failed to show that a presuit demand on the company’s board of directors would have been futile.

  • August 09, 2024

    Judge: No Filing Errors In Dismissed Asbestos Investor Claims Against Honeywell

    WILMINGTON, Del. — After dismissing with prejudice a shareholders’ derivative complaint against Honeywell International Inc. brought by investors over the company’s 2018 announcement increasing its asbestos liability by more than $1 billion, a federal judge in Delaware issued an order determining that all parties complied with a procedural rule the judge said was required by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA).

  • August 08, 2024

    Federal Judge Orders $125M Civil Penalty Against Crypto Firm In SEC Enforcement

    NEW YORK — A crypto asset firm will be required to pay more than $120 million as a civil penalty after a New York federal judge on Aug. 7 granted the Securities and Exchange Commission’s motion for entry of final judgment on the commission’s allegations that cryptocurrencies sold by the firm were effectively unregistered securities.

  • August 08, 2024

    Federal Judge: Musk Rehashes Arguments In Bid For Judgment On Investors’ Claim

    SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California denied Elon Musk’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a putative class complaint brought by investors in the company formerly known as Twitter who say Musk attempted to manipulate the company’s stock price before his takeover, holding that Musk makes nearly identical arguments as he did in a previously denied motion to dismiss.

  • August 07, 2024

    4th Circuit Upholds Receiver’s Distribution Plan For Ponzi Scheme Assets

    RICHMOND, Va. — A panel of the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 6 upheld a Maryland federal judge’s approval of a court-appointed receiver’s plan to distribute assets recovered from a Ponzi scheme that bilked investors out of more than $345 million, finding the judge committed no abuse of discretion in approving the plan, despite the objections from two groups of investors.

  • August 07, 2024

    J&J Tells 3rd Circuit Asbestos-Talc Securities Class ‘Reverse-Engineered’ Case

    PHILADELPHIA — An asbestos-talc securities class produced none of the type of new and corrective disclosures required for class certification and instead “reverse-engineered” their case by working backward from price drops and identifying media reports and verdicts supporting the case, Johnson & Johnson and its executives told the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in urging reversal of class certification.

  • August 06, 2024

    SEC Tells 8th Circuit It Has Authority To Institute Climate Disclosure Rules

    ST. LOUIS — The Securities and Exchange Commission says in an Aug. 6 response brief filed before the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that, contrary to arguments put forward by nearly half of the nation’s states, the commission has the authority to enact disclosure rules related to climate change issues, arguing that the rules will have a material benefit for investors.

  • August 06, 2024

    Judge Won’t Rethink Partial Dismissal Of Stock Drop Suit Against AI Lending Firm

    CINCINNATI — A federal judge in Ohio on Aug. 5 denied a lending platform’s motion to reconsider a ruling that claims made by shareholders about the platform’s use of artificial intelligence to approve loans are actionable, holding that the lending platform incorrectly argued that the investors’ inability to establish a single factor in a multi-factor test to determine scienter “is so essential that its inapplicability is fatal to Plaintiffs’ claims.”

  • August 06, 2024

    Judge: Investors Cite Only Opinions, Not Falsehoods, In Medical Stock Drop Suit

    NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York granted a pharmaceutical company’s motion to dismiss a putative class complaint brought against it by investors who claimed the company and certain of its executives issued misleading statements about a drug it was developing for a kidney disease; the judge found that “nearly every one” of the statements cited by the investors was an unactionable forward-looking statement.

  • August 05, 2024

    Judge: Investor’s Claim Medical Company Lied About AI To Raise Stock Price Fails

    HARTFORD, Conn. — An investor who brought a putative class complaint against a medical company, claiming it misled investors both about its artificial intelligence data platform and its own financial results, failed to illustrate in his amended complaint how some of the alleged misstatements were false and also failed to show that any of them were knowingly made, a Connecticut federal judge held, dismissing the complaint without prejudice.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Securities archive.