Allen Matkins Says Ex-Atty's Role Shouldn't DQ Firm

By Aaron West · October 20, 2023, 9:22 PM EDT

Allen Matkins has reiterated that a California federal court should not disqualify the firm from representing a pair of landowners in a suit from Union Pacific, arguing that a former attorney's...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Brief
Order

Case Information

Case Title

Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Robert E. Hill, et al

Case Number

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Environmental Matters

Date Filed

April 30, 2021

Recent Articles By Aaron

February 14, 2024
NJ Law Firm Beats Malpractice Claims Over Real Estate Deal
January 26, 2024
Nelson Mullins' Rates Spark Coverage Spat Over Builder's Suit
January 24, 2024
Atty For Blackstone Cos. Set For Howard Hughes' GC Spot
December 14, 2023
Toll Brothers Adds Former Johnson Controls GC To Board
December 05, 2023
Sheppard Mullin Brings On Stroock Real Estate Pros In Calif.
November 21, 2023
Ohio Firm Must Face Malpractice Suit Over Mineral Rights
November 21, 2023
Real Estate Co. NNN Names PHM Brands Exec As GC
October 25, 2023
Judge Says His JPMorgan Shares Won't Affect Mall Debt Suit
October 16, 2023
Colo. Atty Disciplined For Secretly Working For Kansas Firm
September 11, 2023
Sonder Holdings Appoints Former AlerisLife CEO As GC