In re: 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties
Case Number:
1:08-cv-10934
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Akerman LLP
- Berliner Corcoran
- Boies Schiller
- Cohen Milstein
- Cyrulnik Fattaruso
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- DLA Piper
- Foote Mielke
- Heideman Nudelman
- Herrick Feinstein
- Howarth & Smith
- Jaffe & Asher
- Katten Muchin
- Kobre & Kim
- McGuireWoods
- Offit Kurman
- Patterson Belknap
- Ramey & Hailey
- Spertus Landes
- Stark & Stark
- Stroock & Stroock
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- The Berkman Law Office
- Wiggins Childs
- Zuckerman Spaeder
-
September 15, 2015
Here's Where The Iran-Owned NYC Tower Litigation Stands
As U.S. officials wrestled with the Iran nuclear deal all summer, the New York federal courts continued their long-running task of untangling litigation over proceeds from the sale of Iran's interests in 650 Fifth Avenue, a Manhattan tower. Here is a primer on four key developments in the case as buzz builds that the property is getting closer to being sold.
-
May 22, 2015
Fight Over Doc-Sharing Erupts In Iran-Owned Tower Dispute
Defendants in a suit over Iranian interests in a Manhattan building said Thursday that the plaintiff 9/11 victims' request to send confidential documents to the U.K., so their judgment can be enforced there, is unnecessary and fails to guarantee the information will stay private.
-
April 29, 2015
Bomb Victims Eye 2nd Circ. Appeal Over Iran-Held NY Tower
A proposed class of bombing victims gave notice Tuesday that it would ask the Second Circuit to overturn a New York federal judge's decision blocking them from intervening in a suit over proceeds from the sale of Iranian interests in a Manhattan building, marking the second such appeal notice to be filed this month.
-
April 17, 2015
Proposed Class Can't Intervene In Iran-Owned NYC Tower Suit
A New York federal judge Friday denied a motion to intervene brought by a group of victims and families of victims of a 1983 terrorist bombing in a suit over proceeds from the sale of Iranian interests in a Manhattan building, ruling that the motion was untimely.
-
April 07, 2015
Family Lobs Appeal Over Being Barred In NYC Tower Suit
In the latest turn in a New York federal court suit over the sale of Iran's interest in a federally seized Manhattan tower, a family that was recently denied a request to intervene in the action filed an interlocutory appeal on Tuesday, contending that they should have an equal opportunity at taking a bite out of the proceeds.
-
March 11, 2015
Proposed Class Seeks Spot In Iran-Owned NYC Tower Spat
In the latest twist to a suit over proceeds from the sale of Iranian interests in a Manhattan building, a group of victims and families of victims of a 1983 terrorist bombing asked a New York federal court on Tuesday to let them intervene as a limited fund class.
-
March 09, 2015
Families Can't Secure Priority To Iran-Owned Tower's Payout
A New York federal judge has refused to grant partial summary judgment giving certain families of terrorism victims a priority to proceeds from the sale of Iran's interests in Manhattan tower 650 Fifth Avenue.
-
March 06, 2015
Family Blasts Gov't, Creditors In Iran-Owned Tower Spat
A family seeking to intervene in a suit over assets from the sale of Iran's interest in a Manhattan tower blasted the U.S. government and existing judgment creditors on Friday, alleging they wrongfully tried to get around forfeiture case rules, and asked the court to set a deadline for any further opposition.
-
February 19, 2015
Gov't, Court Slap Down Claimant Hopefuls in NYC Tower Suit
The U.S. government on Wednesday blasted a family looking to intervene in a suit over the sale of Iran's interest in a Manhattan tower as being too late to the table, on the heels of a New York federal judge denying another party looking to become a claimant to the assets.
-
February 10, 2015
Consolidation Squabble Heats Up In NY Iran-Held Tower Suit
The grandson of a terrorist victim with a $307.5 million claim against Iran again urged a New York federal court on Monday to consolidate his case with a suit related to the sale of Iran's interest in a Manhattan tower, arguing that the merger would not unfairly impact other plaintiffs.