James Estakhrian v. Mark Obenstine et al

  1. February 29, 2016

    Atty In King & Spalding Condo Suit Gets Discovery Sanctions

    A California attorney involved in a proposed malpractice class action against King & Spalding LLP over a botched settlement in a Las Vegas condominium contract suit was smacked Monday with sanctions for failing to hand over emails during discovery, which a special master found was clearly in bad faith.

  2. February 16, 2016

    King & Spalding's $4.6M Malpractice Deal Gets Initial OK

    A California federal judge on Tuesday gave initial support to a $4.6 million deal between King & Spalding LLP and a proposed class of investors accusing the firm of malpractice by forcing a shoddy settlement in a prior condominium contract suit, finding it to be a cogent resolution.

  3. January 28, 2016

    King & Spalding Wants Part Of $4.6M Malpractice Deal Secret

    King & Spalding LLP asked a California federal judge on Thursday to keep under wraps some of the terms of a proposed $4.6 million deal in a suit accusing the firm and others of failing to disclose a conflict of interest in a Las Vegas condominium dispute.

  4. January 22, 2016

    King & Spalding Malpractice Claims Lack Evidence, Atty Says

    A Las Vegas attorney in a proposed malpractice class action brought against him and King & Spalding LLP over a botched settlement in a condominium contract suit on Thursday urged a California federal judge to toss the action, saying all of the claims are speculative and lack specific evidence.

  5. January 20, 2016

    Atty In King & Spalding Malpractice Suit Escapes Sanctions

    A California federal judge on Tuesday refused to sanction a Las Vegas attorney involved in a proposed malpractice class action against King & Spalding LLP over a botched settlement in a condominium contract suit, saying accusations that he withheld discovery should be brought before a special master.

  6. September 10, 2015

    King & Spalding Tries Again With $4.6M Malpractice Deal

    Plaintiffs accusing King & Spalding LLP and others of botching the settlement of a condominium contract suit again sought approval for a $4.6 million deal to let the firm out of the suit, saying they've taken steps to avoid potential conflicts for absent class members.

  7. July 09, 2015

    King & Spalding Must Rework $4.6M Class Malpractice Deal

    A California federal judge on Thursday refused to sign off on a $4.6 million deal to let King & Spalding LLP out of a malpractice class action over an allegedly botched settlement in a condominium contract suit, saying a related suit may disqualify most class counsel.

  8. May 28, 2015

    King & Spalding Will Pay $4.62M To Settle Condo Deal Fight

    King & Spalding LLP has agreed to pay $4.62 million to settle a putative class action accusing the firm and others of violating consumer protection law by botching the settlement of a condominium contract suit, according to a Wednesday filing in California federal court.

  9. August 25, 2011

    Fight Over Condo Deal Doesn't Belong In Calif.: Attys

    Marquis & Aurbach PC and a private practitioner on Wednesday urged a California federal judge to toss a putative class action accusing them and King & Spalding LLP of violating consumer protection law by botching the settlement of a condominium contract suit.