Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Barclays Bank Plc, et al
Case Number:
1:11-cv-06190
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 06, 2014
Fannie, Freddie Didn't Know MBS Loans Were Toxic: FHFA
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac didn't know of the falsity of misrepresentations that banks made when selling them toxic mortgage-backed securities before the financial crisis, the Federal Housing Finance Agency claimed in court documents publicly filed Tuesday.
-
October 18, 2013
JPMorgan, Others Lose Bid For FHFA Docs In MBS Fight
A New York federal judge on Wednesday denied a bid by several banks including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Barclays Bank PLC to compel the Federal Housing Finance Agency to produce about 22,000 documents related to the agency's cases over toxic mortgage-backed securities, citing the FHFA's invocation of privilege.
-
November 19, 2012
Barclays Ducks Claims In FHFA's Suit Over $5B In MBS Sales
A New York federal judge Monday dismissed Federal Housing Finance Agency claims against Barclays PLC, ruling that the bank isn't liable under a Virginia law for selling $4.9 billion in purportedly shoddy mortgage-backed securities to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac because it didn't sell the securities itself.
-
August 21, 2012
FHFA Claims Over $5B In MBS Time-Barred, Barclays Says
Barclays Bank PLC asked a New York federal judge Friday to toss the Federal Housing Finance Agency's suit over $4.9 billion in purportedly shoddy mortgage-backed securities sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, arguing some of the agency's claims may be time-barred.