Muellner et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

0:15-cv-00596

Court:

Minnesota

Nature of Suit:

Contract: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Patrick J. Schiltz

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. October 19, 2015

    Assurant, US Bank Settle In Force-Placed Insurance Suit

    U.S. Bank and an Assurant subsidiary on Friday inked a settlement with unknown terms with a putative class of home insurance consumers claiming in Minnesota federal court that the bank retroactively applied force-placed insurance and charged for a time period that had already passed.

  2. July 16, 2015

    Assurant, US Bank Force-Placed Suit Stayed For Discovery

    A Minnesota federal judge on Wednesday gave a putative class, an Assurant Inc. unit and U.S. Bank three months for additional discovery to prove whether the plaintiff has standing to bring a case accusing the insurance giant and bank of backdating force-placed insurance and running a kickback scheme.

  3. July 09, 2015

    Assurant Unit Says Recent Ruling Blunts Force-Placed Suit

    An Assurant Inc. subsidiary on Thursday asked a Minnesota federal judge to consider a recent ruling on standing when deciding whether to dismiss a case accusing it and U.S. Bank of backdating force-placed insurance while refusing to pass along refunds and engaging in a kickback scheme.

  4. June 09, 2015

    US Bank's Bid To Ax Force-Placed Suit Jumps Gun, Court Told

    Former homeowners accusing U.S. Bank and an Assurant Inc. subsidiary in Minnesota federal court of backdating force-placed insurance while refusing to pass along refunds and engaging in a kickback scheme said Monday that the companies' attempts to dismiss the case are premature.