May 04, 2023
George Sheetz, Petitioner v. County of El Dorado, California
Case Number:
22-1074
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Abbott & Kindermann
- Akin Gump
- Baker Botts
- Coblentz Patch
- Covington & Burling
- Jones Day
- McKinley Conger
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Rutan & Tucker
- Shute Mihaly
- Vinson & Elkins
- Zacks & Freedman
Companies
- Atlantic Legal Foundation Inc.
- California Housing Defense Fund
- California State Association of Counties
- Cato Institute
- National Association of Clean Water Agencies
- National Association of Realtors
- Pacific Legal Foundation
- Texas Public Policy Foundation
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
April 12, 2024
Justices Back Property Owner In Dispute Over Permit Fees
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Friday that a $23,420 local traffic impact fee charged to a California property owner's rural manufactured home isn't exempt from scrutiny as a Fifth Amendment taking simply because the charge is allowed by legislation.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
View the parties now
Already a subscriber? Click here to login