Judge Isn't Playing Favorites In Real Estate Suit, Court Told

By Dani Meyer · March 24, 2016, 2:01 PM EDT

Real estate holding companies facing allegations that they benefited from a racketeering scheme are overreacting by trying to disqualify a magistrate judge over comments he made during a bench trial, two...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Response in Opposition to Motion

Case Information

Case Title

HPC US Fund 1, L.P. et al v. Wood et al

Case Number

Court

Florida Southern

Nature of Suit

Racketeer/Corrupt Organization

Date Filed

August 22, 2013

Recent Articles By Dani

June 09, 2016
Top NY Court Won't Expand Attorney-Client Privilege
May 23, 2016
Gov't Says Reversal Doesn't Justify Recusal In Superfund Suit
May 04, 2016
Stroock Hit With Malpractice Suit Over Soured Loan Deal
April 06, 2016
Rising Star: Kasowitz's Douglas Heitner
March 22, 2016
Calif. Atty Denied Bid To Stay King & Spalding Condo Suit
March 21, 2016
Reed Smith Can't Have Info In Fire Fight, Ex-Client Argues
March 16, 2016
Greenberg Traurig Halts Plans For BLP Merger
March 15, 2016
Greenberg, Shapiro Sued Over Real Estate Settlement
March 15, 2016
Sanctions Against Calif. Atty Aren't Enough, Court Told
March 14, 2016
Ex-Cushman & Wakefield Client Can't Nix Philly Project Suit