Bombardier Aerospace Corp. v. USA
Case Number:
15-10468
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 19, 2016
Full 5th Circ. Won't Rehear Bombardier's $32M Tax Appeal
The Fifth Circuit on Tuesday refused to rehear Bombardier Aerospace Corp.'s dispute with the Internal Revenue Service over whether companies providing aircraft management fees owe commercial aviation taxes, keeping Bombardier on the hook for $32 million in aviation excise taxes.
-
September 16, 2016
Aviation Group Backs Bombardier In $32M Tax Appeal
The National Business Aviation Association backed Bombardier Aerospace Corp. on Wednesday in the company's efforts to persuade the Fifth Circuit to overturn a panel's decision that it was on the hook for $32 million in aviation excise taxes.
-
September 08, 2016
Bombardier Asks Full 5th Circ. To Hear $32M Tax Appeal
Bombardier Aerospace Corp. pressed the full Fifth Circuit Wednesday to overturn a panel's decision keeping it on the hook for $32 million in aviation excise taxes, arguing the IRS had given conflicting guidance on whether companies providing aircraft management fees owe commercial aviation taxes.
-
July 26, 2016
5th Circ. Says Bombardier Can't Ditch Aviation Taxes
The Fifth Circuit affirmed a Texas district court ruling that Bombardier Aerospace Corp. was on the hook for $32 million in aviation excise taxes, saying Monday the district court applied the proper test in analyzing the aircraft management company's tax liability.
-
November 03, 2015
Bombardier Slams Use Of IRS Test In $32M Excise Tax Suit
Bombardier Aerospace Corp. told the Fifth Circuit on Monday that the IRS has wrongly found that it's liable for a federal aviation excise tax on fees it charged to customers and not due a $32 million refund, saying the agency is relying on a test that's absent from the relevant statutes and legislative history.
-
August 14, 2015
Bombardier Asks 5th Circ. To Revive $32M Excise Tax Row
Bombardier Aerospace Corp. on Thursday asked the Fifth Circuit to review a lower court's finding that it was liable for a federal aviation excise tax on fees that it charged to customers and was not due a $32 million refund.