Gumm et al v. Molinaroli et al
Case Number:
2:16-cv-01093
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Bragar Eagel
- Foley & Lardner
- Glancy Prongay
- Lockridge Grindal
- Mallery SC
- Pines Bach
- Stafford Rosenbaum
- Wachtell Lipton
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 18, 2017
JCI Investors Fight To Protect Tax Suit Over $16.6B Inversion
A putative class of Johnson Controls Inc. shareholders told a Wisconsin federal court Thursday that there is undeniable proof that they weren't warned of being shortchanged by more than $5 billion when the company attempted to dodge tax liabilities related to its merger with Tyco International PLC.
-
April 04, 2017
JCI Looks To Toss Shareholder Tax Suit Over $17B Inversion
Johnson Controls Inc. asked a Wisconsin federal judge Monday to toss a suit by a putative class of shareholders who claim the company bamboozled them into shouldering tax costs related to the company’s $16.6 billion merger with Tyco International PLC, saying the shareholders have failed to state a claim.
-
January 26, 2017
JCI Shareholders Lose Injunction Bid In $17B Inversion Suit
A Wisconsin federal judge on Wednesday rejected a request for preliminary injunction to force Johnson Controls Inc. to cover any inversion-related tax burden incurred by shareholders from its $16.6 billion merger with Tyco International PLC, finding a tax liability does not constitute irreparable harm.
-
September 30, 2016
Johnson Should Pay Taxes On $17B Inversion, Investors Say
A proposed class of Johnson Controls shareholders asked a Wisconsin federal judge Friday to force the company to assume any inversion-related taxes arising from its $16.6 billion merger with Tyco, arguing that the deal foists what should be the company's tax burden on common shareholders.
-
August 17, 2016
Johnson, Tyco Ink $16.6B Inversion As Shareholders Balk
Shareholders for Johnson Controls and Tyco International PLC approved their $16.6 billion corporate inversion Wednesday, the day after a putative class of shareholders objected with a federal suit over the terms of the deal.