Donald J. Trump, et al., Petitioners v. Mazars USA, LLP, et al.
Case Number:
19-715
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Akin Gump
- Arnold & Porter
- Blank Rome
- Clinton & Peed
- Complex Appellate Litigation Group
- Consovoy McCarthy
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Foster Garvey
- Gibbs Law Group
- Law Office of Lawrence J. Joseph
- Lieff Cabraser
- Munger Tolles
- Pierce Bainbridge
- Wilkinson Stekloff
Companies
- American Civil Liberties Union
- Boston University
- Capital One Financial Corp.
- Deutsche Bank AG
- Mazars LLP
- Public Citizen Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 20, 2020
Justices Won't Fast-Track Trump's House Subpoena Case
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to expedite its decision to deny immediate enforcement of House committees' subpoenas for President Donald Trump's financial information, meaning lower-court proceedings in the case will not resume until August at the earliest.
-
July 16, 2020
Action On House Subpoenas Shouldn't Rush, Trump Tells Justices
Expediting lower-court proceedings in President Donald Trump's suit to block subpoenas of his financial records by several House committees would be contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court's judgment in the case, Trump's attorneys told the justices Thursday.
-
July 09, 2020
Justices Block Dems' Trump Financial Doc Requests For Now
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday vacated lower-court decisions upholding subpoenas issued by three House committees for President Donald Trump's financial information, saying the courts did not adequately consider separation of powers issues.
-
May 12, 2020
Justices Probe House Panels' Authority To Seek Trump Docs
In oral arguments Tuesday regarding congressional subpoenas seeking President Donald Trump's financial information, U.S. Supreme Court justices focused much of their questioning on defining the limits of congressional committees' authority to seek the records.
-
May 11, 2020
Justices To Weigh Division Of Power In Trump Subpoena Suits
Cases involving congressional subpoenas for President Donald Trump's financial information will be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday, and the justices' ultimate decision has the potential to alter the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches.
-
May 08, 2020
Trump Subpoena Suits Not Mere Political Spats, Justices Told
House committees' suits to enforce subpoenas for President Donald Trump's financial records are not fundamentally political and can be decided in the courts, Trump, the committees and the U.S. Solicitor General told the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday.
-
April 27, 2020
Justices Seek Briefs On 'Political Question' In Trump Cases
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ordered President Donald Trump, U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco and House committees seeking Trump's financial records to provide the court with additional arguments on whether their court dispute is fundamentally political.
-
April 15, 2020
Justices Set Trump Subpoena Cases' Arguments For May 12
The U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled oral arguments for May 12 in separate cases considering the validity of subpoenas seeking President Donald Trump's financial information, according to a schedule published Wednesday.
-
March 27, 2020
House Panels Can't Subpoena Trump's Records, Justices Told
House committees cannot subpoena President Donald Trump's financial records, including his tax information, because such a request wasn't explicitly authorized, and the information sought couldn't lead to valid legislation, Trump's attorneys told the U.S. Supreme Court Friday.
-
March 23, 2020
Justices Allow Solicitor General To Argue In Trump Tax Bouts
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said the U.S. solicitor general can participate in oral arguments in two suits seeking President Donald Trump's tax returns and other financial information.