Michael Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Case Number:
20-16796
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 22, 2024
Calif. Justices OK Argentine Atty's Uber Fraud Fight
California justices gave an Argentinian lawyer a green light Thursday to pursue allegations that Uber fraudulently hid crucial information as he represented Uber before its Buenos Aires launch, clarifying that his tort fraudulent-concealment claim is not necessarily barred by the so-called economic loss doctrine if his employment contract never contemplated the alleged fraud.
-
June 04, 2024
Atty's Argentine Uber Debut Fight Lands At Calif. High Court
Barring fraudulent concealment claims under the so-called economic loss doctrine would create "perverse incentives" for people to draw others into contracts and "have their way with them," the California Supreme Court was told Tuesday by counsel for an Argentinian attorney suing Uber on allegations it hid crucial information from him.
-
February 15, 2022
Calif. High Court Will Hear Argentine Atty's Uber Fraud Suit
The California Supreme Court will consider whether an Argentine lawyer can sue Uber under Golden State law for allegedly hiding crucial information about its regulatory compliance when he represented Uber's subsidiaries during the ride-hailing giant's problem-plagued Buenos Aires launch.
-
December 07, 2021
9th Circ. Sends Argentine Atty's Uber Suit To Calif. High Court
The Ninth Circuit has asked the California Supreme Court to decide whether an Argentine lawyer can sue Uber under California law alleging the company hid important information from him when he represented its subsidiaries during its problem-plagued Buenos Aires launch.