Relentless, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Department of Commerce, et al.
Case Number:
22-1219
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 01, 2024
Tax Credit Transfer Regs Show IRS Caution In Rulemaking
The IRS and Treasury's final rules on the sale and transfer of green energy credits maintained a strict reading of the statute while making few changes, a sign of caution by regulators amid judicial scrutiny of the government's rulemaking authority.
-
March 26, 2024
Jackson Paints Abortion Clash As Microcosm Of Bigger Brawl
A war of words Tuesday at the U.S. Supreme Court over access to abortion medication marked a climactic moment after a lengthy legal slugfest. But probing questions from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson illustrated that the main event for reproductive rights was also simply a single round in a much larger fight over the government's regulatory powers.
-
March 15, 2024
Direct Hit On Tax Regs Unlikely If Justices Ditch Chevron
A decision from the U.S. Supreme Court later this year on two cases challenging the so-called Chevron doctrine, which gives federal agencies wide latitude to interpret ambiguous laws, isn't likely to immediately affect tax regulations.
-
February 21, 2024
Liberal Justices Hint Chevron Deference Hanging By A Thread
In the U.S. Supreme Court's latest battle royal over administrative powers, left-leaning justices at oral arguments Tuesday openly suggested that the landmark legal doctrine underpinning modern rulemaking might soon shrivel up, clearing the way for industry-led challenges to regulations on the books for decades.
-
February 05, 2024
Ambiguity Is Key To Triggering Agency Deference
The Chevron deference is a powerful precedent that can require a federal court to yield to an agency's interpretation of a statute, but a court is free to undertake its own analysis when the administrative law framework doesn't apply, attorneys told Law360.
-
January 24, 2024
Bid To Swap Chevron For An Old Standby Raises Doubts
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court debated whether a World War II-era doctrine encouraging courts to strongly consider agency statutory interpretations could replace the court's controversial so-called Chevron doctrine that requires judges to defer to those interpretations if a statute is ambiguous.
-
January 18, 2024
4 Ways Future Chevron Decision May Affect Wage Landscape
Attorneys say a forthcoming U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the Chevron doctrine could mean less yielding to federal agencies in cases challenging wage and hour regulations, and new approaches to litigating such cases. Here, Law360 explores potential impacts of the forthcoming ruling.
-
January 18, 2024
'Chaos' Warning Resonates As Justices Mull Chevron's Fate
A conservative-led campaign against the 40-year-old doctrine of judicial deference to federal regulators appeared vulnerable at U.S. Supreme Court arguments Wednesday to predictions of a litigation tsunami, as justices fretted about an onslaught of suits and politicization of the federal judiciary.
-
January 17, 2024
Thomas Gets Laugh, Agrees Prior Ruling Is 'Embarrassment'
The specter of a major 2005 telecommunications ruling hung over U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Wednesday as he and his colleagues considered whether to toss the court's decades-old precedent instructing judges to defer to federal agencies' interpretations of ambiguous statutes.
-
January 17, 2024
5 Key Takeaways From Supreme Court's Chevron Arguments
U.S. Supreme Court justices questioned Wednesday whether overturning a decades-old precedent instructing courts to defer to federal agencies' interpretations of ambiguous statutes would lead judges to legislate from the bench or diminish the value of Supreme Court precedent — and pondered whether they could "Kisorize" the doctrine rather than doing away with it altogether.