Rule 36 Affirmance Can Have Preclusive Effect At PTAB Too

By Adam Fowles ( January 4, 2019, 2:02 PM EST) -- The Federal Circuit has affirmed that a Rule 36 judgment may serve as a basis for collateral estoppel in Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings, in addition to district court proceedings. In VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc.,[1] the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's determination in two inter partes reviews that a prior art document was a printed publication. While the PTAB's final written decision did not reach the merits of any collateral estoppel argument,[2] the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's determination in those two IPRs that a prior art document was a printed publication expressly on the basis of collateral estoppel in view of a Rule 36 affirmance.[3]...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!