Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
VirnetX Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
Case Number:
6:12-cv-00855
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Ahmad Zavitsanos
- Bruster PLLC
- Buss & Benefield
- Caldwell Cassady
- Charhon Callahan
- Cherian LLP
- Cohen Ziffer
- Desmarais LLP
- Jackson Walker LLP
- Kirkland & Ellis
- McKool Smith
- Orrick Herrington
- Parker Bunt
- Perkins Coie
- Potter Minton
- Robins Kaplan
- Skiermont Derby
- Williams Morgan
- WilmerHale
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 30, 2016
Apple Slams VirnetX Bid To Get $625M Patent Award Revived
Apple shot back at VirnetX's bid to get a Texas federal judge to reconsider a decision scrapping a $625 million patent infringement win against the tech giant, telling the court on Monday that the network security firm has brought no new evidence to the table.
-
August 12, 2016
Apple Missed Chance To Pause Patent Case, VirnetX Says
VirnetX on Friday urged a Texas federal judge to reject Apple's attempt to hold off on any action regarding the tech giant's $625 million patent infringement loss given pending Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings, saying Apple waited too long in the six-year litigation to ask for a stay.
-
August 10, 2016
Apple Had Fair Trial In $625M Patent Loss, VirnetX Argues
VirnetX on Wednesday urged a Texas federal judge to reconsider a decision scrapping its $625 million patent infringement win against Apple, saying the order for new trials is an abuse of court discretion and based on flawed analysis.
-
July 29, 2016
Apple Gets New Trials, Scraps VirnetX's $625M Patent Win
A Texas federal judge vacated VirnetX's colossal $625 million patent infringement verdict against Apple on Friday, ruling it was unfair to Apple to combine two separate VirnetX suits alleging Apple infringed its network security patents into one trial, and he split the suits and ordered a pair of new trials.
-
July 26, 2016
Apple Says Cuozzo Ruling Should Halt $625M VirnetX Case
Apple Inc. on Monday renewed its bid to stay a $625 million patent infringement verdict pending invalidation proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeals Board, arguing the U.S. Supreme Court's June Cuozzo decision bolsters its argument to put the Eastern District of Texas case on ice.
-
May 25, 2016
VirnetX Wants Apple's FaceTime Stopped After $625M Win
VirnetX Inc. asked an Eastern District of Texas court Wednesday to enjoin Apple Inc. from continuing its FaceTime and iMessage features, while the tech giant sought to overturn its $625 million patent infringement verdict.
-
April 18, 2016
Apple Can Contact Jurors Who Delivered $625M IP Verdict
A Texas federal judge on Monday allowed Apple to question the jurors who ordered the tech giant to pay internet security company VirnetX $625 million for patent infringement, although he limited the iPhone maker's communications to court-approved questionnaires.
-
April 06, 2016
Apple Accuses VirnetX Of 'Unabashed Smear' In $625M IP Row
Apple urged a Texas federal judge Monday to let it question the jurors who ordered the tech giant to pay VirnetX $625 million for patent infringement, accusing the Internet security company of using "an unabashed smear" to fight the iPhone maker's request.
-
March 24, 2016
VirnetX Wants Apple Barred From Jurors In $625M Patent Case
VirnetX urged a Texas federal judge Wednesday to deny Apple's request to question the jurors who ordered the tech giant to pay VirnetX $625 million for patent infringement, saying the iPhone maker is trying to "ransack for new grounds to impeach the jury's verdict."
-
March 07, 2016
VirnetX Calls Apple Abusive, Wants $195M More In Damages
VirnetX Inc. urged a Texas federal court Friday to grant attorneys' fees and nearly $200 million more in damages weeks after a jury ordered Apple to pay $625.6 million for infringing four of its network security patents with its iPhone operating system, saying the tech giant's conduct was abusive.