Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
United States of America ex rel. Hassan Foreman v. AECOM, et al
Case Number:
1:16-cv-01960
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Judge:
Firms
- Berger Montague
- Bloch & White
- Bragalone Olejko
- Cherian LLP
- Fitch Even
- Kaplan Hecker
- Nelson Bumgardner
- Paul Weiss
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 18, 2024
AECOM Calls FCA Suit Alleging False Army Billing 'Meritless'
AECOM has pushed to end a False Claims Act suit alleging that it falsely billed the U.S. Army on a $1.9 billion support deal, saying the whistleblower who filed the suit hadn't shown that his remaining allegations were material to the government.
-
November 19, 2021
2nd Circ. Revives Fraud Billing Claim In $1.9B Army Deal Suit
The Second Circuit partially revived a whistleblower's suit alleging AECOM breached a $1.9 billion maintenance deal with the U.S. Army, finding Friday that the lower court shouldn't have considered an external document when tossing accusations of false billing practices.
-
May 12, 2020
AECOM Rips 'Confused' Whistleblower On $1.9B Army Deal
Military contractor AECOM repeatedly called a former supervisor-turned-whistleblower "confused" in his efforts to revive claims that a $1.9 billion agreement to provide the U.S. Army with transportation services was violated, after a New York federal judge already let the contractor off the hook.
-
April 28, 2020
AECOM Kept $1.9B Deal Because Of War, Whistleblower Says
A whistleblower urged a New York federal judge to revive a lawsuit against military contractor AECOM, saying the U.S. Army's decision to extend the company's $1.9 billion contract despite fraud reports did not undermine his claims since it was necessary to maintain the military's presence in Afghanistan.
-
April 14, 2020
AECOM Beats Whistleblower Suit Over $1.9B Army Deal
A New York federal judge has tossed a whistleblower's suit alleging that AECOM violated its $1.9 billion maintenance deal with the U.S. Army, saying that the government's knowledge of these breaches shows that they weren't significant to the contract.