Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re: Fisher-Price Rock 'n Play Sleeper Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
Case Number:
1:19-md-02903
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Beasley Allen
- Bursor & Fisher
- Connors LLP
- DeNittis Osefchen
- Duthie Savastano
- Forchelli Deegan
- Gokal Law Group
- Goldberg Segalla
- Goodwin Procter
- Greenberg Traurig
- Herzfeld Suetholz
- Kantrowitz Goldhamer
- King & Spalding
- Law Offices of Jonathan A. Sorkowitz
- Lockridge Grindal
- Manatt Phelps
- Pierce Bainbridge
- Pittman Dutton
- Secrest Hill
- Shindler Anderson
- Stranch Jennings
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 25, 2024
Fisher-Price, Mattel Ink $19M Deal Over Recalled Baby Sleeper
Fisher-Price and parent company Mattel asked a Buffalo federal judge for preliminary approval for a $19 million payment to settle a class action over a recalled baby sleeper that a group of consumers claims was falsely advertised as safe.
-
February 14, 2024
Fisher-Price, Mattel Settle MDL Over Recalled Baby Sleeper
Fisher-Price and parent company Mattel have reached a settlement with a class of consumers who claimed the Rock 'n Play Sleeper was falsely advertised as safe for infants to sleep in despite several deaths related to the product.
-
June 02, 2022
NY Fisher-Price Buyers Win Issues Cert. In Rock 'N Play MDL
A New York federal judge on Thursday certified a so-called issues class of consumers who claim Fisher-Price falsely advertised the Rock 'n Play Sleeper as safe for infant sleep, pointing to classwide liability questions but saying damages will need to be determined individually.