Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Missouri, et al.
Case Number:
21A240
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
Companies
- American Medical Association Inc.
- American Public Health Association
- Reliant
- Service Employees International Union
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 21, 2022
The Rulings That Quickly Made 2022 Huge For Health Law
A spree of remarkable rulings has already made 2022 a jaw-dropping year for health care and pharmaceutical law, where the U.S. Supreme Court reshaped abortion rights, opioid crisis prosecutions, Medicare's rulemaking powers and vital sources of hospital income. At the midyear mark, Law360 recaps the rulings and analyzes their implications.
-
January 13, 2022
Justices Sink Vax-Or-Test Rule But Clear Health Care Mandate
The U.S. Supreme Court slammed the brakes Thursday on a Biden administration vaccine-or-testing rule for private businesses with at least 100 employees, but let a stricter yet narrower rule aimed at the health care industry take effect nationwide.
-
January 07, 2022
'You Can't Kill Patients': Justices Open To CMS Vaccine Rule
The U.S. Supreme Court appeared receptive Friday to a sweeping mandate requiring coronavirus vaccinations for millions of health care workers, with multiple conservative justices joining liberals in discerning legal authority for the Biden administration's controversial rule.
-
December 22, 2021
High Court To Review Federal Vaccine Mandates Next Month
The U.S. Supreme Court said Wednesday that it will hear oral arguments on Jan. 7 as to whether the Biden administration can enforce COVID-19 vaccine mandates for certain health care workers and force companies with at least 100 employees to require coronavirus vaccinations or have workers take weekly tests.
-
December 16, 2021
Biden Asks Supreme Court To Revive Health Worker Vax Rule
The Biden administration on Thursday urged the U.S. Supreme Court to do away with injunctions blocking the federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate for certain health care workers, arguing that the move was "squarely within" the federal government's authority and is necessary to save lives.