Expert Analysis

• Unpacking The Rwanda Policy Appeal Decision

  

  The Court of Appeal recently declared the U.K. government's Rwanda policy unlawful in AAA v. Secretary of State, but given that this was only on the basis that Rwanda is not currently a safe third country, it is possible that the real risk of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights breaches will be obviated, says Alex Papasotiriou at Richmond Chambers.

• Getty Case Will Be Pivotal For Generative AI Copyright Issues

  

  The Getty v. Stability AI litigation in the U.K. and U.S. raises legal ambiguities on who owns generative artificial intelligence output, and the outcomes will set a major precedent on copyright practices for businesses in both countries and beyond, say Victoria Albrecht at Springbok AI and Mark O'Conor at DLA Piper.

• ESG Litigation May Move Toward Untrue Statement Claims

  

  As the environmental, social and governance agenda has gained significant momentum, and more activists and investors hold businesses accountable to their commitments, the Financial Services and Markets Act provides a legal vehicle for shareholders to exert pressure on listed companies, say Rupert Lewis and Ceri Morgan at Herbert Smith.

• What The Collective Interests Bill May Mean For Irish Litigation

  

  As multinational corporations continue to increase their presence in Ireland, the forthcoming Collective Interests of Consumers Bill is expected to significantly alter the Irish litigation landscape and provide fertile ground for consumer-led group actions, backed by a gradual edging toward wider third-party litigation funding reform, say lawyers at Kennedys.

• Successfully Implementing AI Rules Requires A Cultural Shift

  

  Recent positive use cases of artificial intelligence demonstrate the potential benefits it can bring to the legal profession, and while the development of AI rules is essential, their effectiveness depends on user adoption, behavioral change and human acceptance, say Charlie Morgan and Salman Dhalla at Herbert Smith.

• Recent Cases Mark Maturation Of CAT Class Cert. Approach

  

  The Competition Appeal Tribunal's recent refusal to grant collective proceedings applications against Visa and MasterCard in the Commercial and Interregional Card Claims case shows that the tribunal takes its role as a gatekeeper seriously, and that it will likely continue to be difficult for defendants to defeat certification first time around, say lawyers at Linklaters.

• Why The UK Needs Tougher Fraud Enforcement

  

  The Crown Court's recent conviction of Anthony Constantinou for running a Ponzi scheme is a rare success for prosecutors, highlighting the legal system's painfully slow course when it comes to complex fraud, and the need for significant funds and resources in the fight against financial crime, says James Clark at Quillon Law.

• Global M&A Outlook: Slow But Moving Along

  

  Global merger and acquisition markets had a tough start to the year, with inflation, rising interest rates and the Ukraine conflict knocking sentiment, but in the macroeconomic, deal makers have continued to unearth pockets of activity to keep deal volumes ticking over, say lawyers at White & Case.

• Emmentaler Case Elucidates Recipe For EU Food Trademarks

  

  In light of the EU General Court recently rejecting the Emmentaler cheese trademark application for lacking distinctive character and not meeting the geographical indication requirements, producers must ensure to protect their trade names before they become commercially generic, says Lars Karnoe at Potter Clarkson.

• Why Int'l Investors Should Keep An Eye On German M&A Regs

  

  While German reform proposals will digitize corporate law formalities that have long been immune to change, international limitations remain, particularly for countries outside the European Union, as Germany moves to tighten regulatory hurdles to control inbound investment, say Marcus Geiss and Sonja Ruttmann at Gibson Dunn.

• Mass EU Privacy Litigation May Be Imminent After GDPR Case

  

  While the EU Court of Justice decision in Österreichische Post, clarifying that personal data infringements under the General Data Protection Regulation must be effectively compensated, has not yet opened the floodgates for data breach litigation, it has definitely encouraged individuals to pursue damage claims, says Jan Spittka at Clyde & Co.

• What Google Case Means For Privacy Class Action Litigation

  

  While the recent High Court decision in Prismall v. Google UK and DeepMind highlights the high bar for bringing collective actions on an opt-out basis and the difficulties of relying on the tort in misuse of private information, it is not impossible as long as the case is right, says Kingsley Hayes at Keller Postman.

• Meta Fine Offers EU Data Privacy Compliance Warning

  

  The recent record €1.2 billion fine against Meta highlights that all transfers of EU personal data to U.S. companies inherently risk breaching the General Data Protection Regulation, so companies should examine whether privacy compliance is sufficiently built into their business model, says Eddie Powell at Fladgate.

• Failed Libel Claim Shows Need For Political Donation Controls

  

  While the recent High Court decision to throw out a Tory donor's libel claim demonstrates that courts will not hesitate to pull the plug on baseless and resource-draining claims, it also highlights the need for robust checks on political party donations and stronger anti-SLAPP legislation, says Helen Taylor at Spotlight on Corruption.

• Unified Patent Court Advantages Leave US Trailing Behind

  

  Amplifying the shortcomings of litigation in the U.S., including inter partes reviews that significantly threaten the validity of patents, the recently launched Unified Patent Court regime will put further pressure on American legislators and add to Europe's attractiveness as a litigation venue, say lawyers at Sisvel and Franzosi Dal Negro.