July 21, 2023
A Grubhub driver urged a federal judge to preserve representative claims brought under California's Private Attorneys General Act in his suit alleging the delivery company misclassified and underpaid workers, saying state law does not support Grubhub's attempt to narrow the pool of workers he can sue on behalf of.
May 31, 2023
A Grubhub driver's individual wage claims in a misclassification suit are too connected to his representative ones and can't be separated, a California federal judge said, rejecting the company's bid to enter a judgment on them.
April 24, 2023
Grubhub called on a California federal court to allow an immediate appeal of a ruling that a delivery worker qualified as an employee rather than an independent contractor, arguing that the decision was built on unsettled law.
March 31, 2023
A California federal judge on Thursday held that a former Grubhub Inc. delivery driver should have been classified as an employee, not a contractor, under Golden State law, and held that he therefore was underpaid under wage law.
September 14, 2022
A California federal judge found that a Grubhub delivery worker could not employ a lenient employee classification test to score a pretrial win on expense reimbursement because that test only applied to wage claims stemming from state wage orders.
May 13, 2022
A former Grubhub driver cannot be considered an employee and reimbursed for expenses under the Dynamex ruling's classification test, the company said, telling a California federal judge the test applies only to wage laws and the driver is litigating reimbursement claims.
January 27, 2022
A former Grubhub driver asked a California federal court to rule that he was the company's employee under the Dynamex three-prong test, which the Ninth Circuit recently said retroactively applies to his case alleging he was misclassified as an independent contractor and denied certain benefits.
November 29, 2018
A California federal judge on Wednesday declined to vacate her February finding that a former GrubHub driver was an independent contractor rather than an employee, but acknowledged that the California Supreme Court's Dynamex ruling might have changed the outcome of the case had it been handed down earlier.
November 13, 2018
A former Grubhub Inc. driver asked the Ninth Circuit on Friday to reverse a finding that he's an independent contractor and not an employee, insisting the worker classification standard set by the California Supreme Court's Dynamex ruling upended it.
October 11, 2018
A former Grubhub driver asked a California federal judge on Thursday to revive allegations that he was misclassified as an independent contractor, saying that had the California Supreme Court's Dynamex decision changing the state's test for employment status come out a few months earlier, he would have won his bench trial.