SMITH v. STROM ENGINEERING CORP.

  1. January 27, 2022

    Staffing Co. Says No Expert Needed On Strike-Breakers' Risks

    Counsel for a temp agency said a labor expert's opinion wasn't necessary to drive home the dangers its workers faced crossing picket lines at a Pennsylvania steel mill, and asked a federal judge Thursday to exclude her testimony from a lawsuit over whether the temps should have been paid while being shuttled past the workers they were replacing.

  2. December 06, 2021

    Temp Agency Slams Steelworkers' OT Class Bid

    A temp agency has argued that "1,000 mini trials" would be needed to determine if a class of temporary steelworkers deserves payment for time spent crossing picket lines, asking a Pennsylvania federal judge to shoot down the workers' class certification bid.

  3. November 04, 2021

    Temp. Steelworkers Request Class Cert. In OT Picket-Line Suit

    A group of over 1,000 temporary steelworkers seeking overtime pay for time spent crossing a picket line at an Allegheny Technologies Inc. mill asked a Pennsylvania federal judge to grant them class certification on Thursday, saying travel across the picket line was a duty shared by workers.

  4. March 24, 2020

    'Shouting Louder' Doesn't Topple Pa. Steelworker's OT Suit

    A temporary steelworker's lawsuit seeking overtime pay for time spent crossing a picket line at an Allegheny Technologies Inc. mill will move ahead, as a Pennsylvania federal judge said the defendant couldn't get the case dismissed just because its argument was "shouted louder."

  5. March 19, 2019

    Temp Co. Seeks To Toss Steelworkers' OT-For-Commute Suit

    The company that hired temporary steelworkers during Allegheny Technologies Inc.'s seven-month union lockout said workers' van rides past the union's picket lines weren't part of their daily duties, and asked a Pennsylvania federal court to dismiss their proposed class action seeking overtime pay Monday.