Moazzaz v. MetLife, Inc. et al

  1. December 13, 2024

    Jury Sides With MetLife In Fired Exec's Pay Bias Suit

    A New York federal judge closed a former MetLife executive's suit after a jury sided with the company on her claims that she was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars less than her male counterparts and passed over for a promotion due to her gender.

  2. May 23, 2024

    Scope Narrows In Pay Bias Suit Against MetLife CEO

    A New York federal judge backtracked on a previous order that left in place all of a female former executive's pay bias claims against MetLife's CEO, limiting the scope of the suit to reflect that he stepped into his role as head of the company only three months before she was terminated.

  3. March 26, 2024

    Gender Pay Bias Claims Against MetLife Allowed To Proceed

    A New York federal judge in Manhattan trimmed hostile work environment and biased firing claims Tuesday from a gender discrimination lawsuit a fired female executive brought against insurance company MetLife, but said there was enough evidence the insurance giant paid her less than her male co-workers and denied her promotions.

  4. March 04, 2021

    MetLife Must Face Gender Bias Claims From Former Exec

    A Manhattan federal judge ruled Thursday that insurance giant MetLife must face most of the gender bias claims by a fired female executive, saying her allegations that colleagues called her a "bitch" with "sharp elbows" pointed to the possibility of broader discrimination. 

  5. January 23, 2020

    MetLife Says 'Slights' Against Ex-Exec Aren't Discrimination

    MetLife has asked a New York federal court to toss a former executive's suit claiming she was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars less than some male colleagues, saying she failed to assert enough facts for her complaints to amount to more than "trivial and petty slights."

  6. November 13, 2019

    MetLife Hit With Gender Bias, Pay Suit From Former Exec

    A former senior vice president at MetLife filed a gender discrimination suit against the insurer in New York federal court Wednesday, claiming she was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars less than men performing equal or less-demanding work and was wrongfully terminated.