Miller v. Amazon.com Inc et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

2:21-cv-00204

Court:

Washington Western

Nature of Suit:

Labor: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Barbara J. Rothstein

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. October 23, 2024

    Amazon Must Face Drivers' Tip Suit Despite FTC Settlement

    A Washington federal judge largely refused Wednesday to toss a proposed class action accusing Amazon of violating Evergreen State laws by withholding portions of drivers' tips, saying the claims are still valid despite the Federal Trade Commission reaching a nearly $62 million deal with the company over the same alleged conduct.

  2. August 10, 2022

    Amazon Delivery Drivers' Tips Suit Will Wait For Ninth Circuit

    A delivery drivers' lawsuit alleging Amazon illegally withheld their tips will stay paused until the Ninth Circuit sorts out whether a U.S. Supreme Court ruling puts the suit in arbitration, a Washington federal judge ruled.

  3. March 30, 2022

    Amazon Tip-Stealing Suit Halted Amid Fight Over Arbitration

    A Washington federal judge has agreed to pause a delivery drivers' suit alleging Amazon withheld their tips, delaying the case while the retail giant appeals the court's finding that it cannot arbitrate the dispute.

  4. February 17, 2022

    Amazon Says Previous Deal Moots New Driver Tipping Suit

    Amazon urged a Washington federal judge to toss a group of Flex drivers' suit claiming the e-commerce giant withheld tips, arguing that the workers are relitigating a settlement that already resolved the issue and that the drivers' various state claims conflict with each other.

  5. July 15, 2021

    Flex Drivers Rip Amazon's 'Bait and Switch' Arbitration Bid

    Amazon Flex drivers told a Washington district court Wednesday that a federal carveout for interstate transportation workers shields them from having to arbitrate their claims that the e-commerce giant withheld drivers' tips, ripping Amazon's attempted "bait-and-switch" argument on the impact of a key Ninth Circuit ruling.