February 17, 2012
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
Case Number:
2:12-cv-00995
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Berger Montague
- Carella Byrne
- Chiesa Shahinian
- Cohn Lifland
- Duane Morris
- Garwin Gerstein
- Lite DePalma
- Lowenstein Sandler
- Patunas Law
- Radice Law Firm
- Robbins Geller
- Troutman Pepper
- Walsh Pizzi
Companies
- Cardinal Health Inc.
- Cencora Inc.
- H.D. Smith LLC
- J.M. Smith Corp.
- McKesson Corp.
- Meijer Inc.
- Morris & Dickson Co. LLC
- Mutual Drug
- Rochester Drug Cooperative Inc.
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
February 28, 2023
Buyers Don't Qualify As Class In Lamictal Antitrust Case
Buyers of a generic epilepsy drug aren't so numerous that they must be allowed to band together in a class action rather than joining their suits together traditionally, said a New Jersey federal judge who has refused to certify their class in an antitrust suit against drugmakers GlaxoSmithKline and Teva Pharmaceuticals.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login