April 18, 2022
Anastasia Wullschleger, et al v. Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc., et al
Case Number:
22-1796
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
August 17, 2023
Dog Food Cos. Say 8th Circ. Should Rethink Remand Order
The Eighth Circuit slipped up when it shipped a suit accusing Nestle and Royal Canin of fraudulently representing certain dog food as prescription back to state court because the claims of federal interest had been removed, say the companies, which want the panel to reconsider.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login