Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Intellectual Property
-
March 28, 2025
Failed Software Secrets Case Costs MasterCard Unit $2.8M
A federal judge in Utah has ordered a MasterCard unit to cough up over $2.8 million in legal fees for "aggressively" litigating an "objectively specious" trade secrets suit against two McKinsey consultants who went on to found one of MasterCard's only serious rivals in a corner of the business analytics software market.
-
March 28, 2025
AIG Trade Secrets Row With Insurance Startup Gets Trimmed
A New Jersey federal court narrowed a trade secrets theft suit brought by AIG units against a new insurer founded by former senior executives, calling claims of interference with contract, breach of fiduciary duty and unauthorized access of AIG's computers unsupported Friday.
-
March 28, 2025
Chinese Pool Parts Supplier Can't Undo False Ads Verdict
A Chinese pool parts supplier can't reverse a jury verdict for false advertising and deceptive business practices, a North Carolina federal judge has said, finding the company tried to bring new arguments that weren't raised at trial.
-
March 28, 2025
Fashion Groups Urge Justices To Hear Discovery Rule Fight
Fashion trade associations have thrown their support behind a shoe designer who wants the U.S. Supreme Court to review her appeal of a Second Circuit decision reviving a photography studio's copyright infringement suit, saying there needs to be more predictability in copyright law.
-
March 28, 2025
9th Circ. Affirms Toss Of 3D Printer Co. Derivative Suit
The Ninth Circuit on Friday affirmed the dismissal of a derivative suit brought by a venture capital firm over an $11 million investment it made in a 3D printing company, with the panel finding the lower court correctly tossed the suit due to previous and ongoing "outside entanglements" between the parties.
-
March 28, 2025
NC Atty Can't Shield Bank Docs From Tycoon In Hacking Suit
A North Carolina attorney and former FBI agent can't stop aviation tycoon Farhad Azima from parsing through his bank records as part of an international hacking conspiracy case, a federal judge said Friday, though he did limit the scope of the records Azima sought.
-
March 28, 2025
UK Litigation Roundup: Here's What You Missed In London
This past week in London has seen sparkling winemaker Nyetimber hit a rival distillery with an intellectual property claim, Newcastle United's former owner Mike Ashley target the club's ex-vice president for damages tied to a fraudulent investment, and a real estate agency file a legal claim against law firm Winston & Strawn LLP. Here, Law360 looks at these and other new claims in the U.K.
-
March 28, 2025
Fed. Circ. Upholds Janssen's Patent Case Win Over Mylan
The Federal Circuit declined on Friday to undo a lower court ruling that kept Mylan Laboratories Ltd. from releasing a generic version of Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s schizophrenia drug Invega Trinza, rejecting Mylan's challenge to a finding that the generic drug would cause physicians to infringe a patent covering its dosing regimen.
-
March 28, 2025
CureVac RNA Vax Patent Survives BioNTech's EU Challenge
CureVac SE has fended off a challenge from BioNTech SE of its mRNA therapy patent at a European patent authority, paving the way for CureVac to forge ahead with litigation in the companies' home country of Germany accusing BioNTech of infringing its invention.
-
March 28, 2025
NC Biz Court Bulletin: TikTok Duel Heats Up, NIL Suit Plays On
In March, the North Carolina Business Court readied for trial in an insurance coverage dispute involving Smithfield Foods, heard why TikTok is subject to the state's jurisdiction, and allowed the Cardiac Pack's NIL suit against the NCAA to proceed while a parallel case plays out.
-
March 27, 2025
X Says It Doesn't Owe Rivals 'Free Ride' In Data Scraping Row
X Corp. urged a California federal judge on Thursday to dismiss antitrust counterclaims brought by data-scraping firm Bright Data Ltd. alleging the social media giant improperly imposes unfavorable contract terms to block competitors from taking its data, arguing it doesn't have to let rivals "free ride" on its platform.
-
March 27, 2025
New Procedures Expected To Result In More PTAB Denials
Under new procedures where the director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office will decide whether petitions challenging patents should be denied for discretionary reasons, such denials will likely increase, although the policy leaves many unanswered questions, attorneys say.
-
March 27, 2025
Fed. Circ. Orders New Trial In Roland Drum Kit Patent Dispute
The Federal Circuit says a jury in Miami will have to take another look at a nearly decadelong fight over electric drumming patents, deciding on Thursday to wipe out the entirety of a $4.6 million verdict the Japanese audio tech giant Roland Corp. won against a U.S.-based rival.
-
March 27, 2025
Dua Lipa Beats Claim 'Levitating' Ripped Off 1979 Disco Song
Grammy-winning singer Dua Lipa's chart-topping song "Levitating" did not infringe a 1979 disco song, a New York federal judge ruled Thursday, saying a combination of a descending chord progression and musical note in the older work wasn't protectable under copyright law.
-
March 27, 2025
Fed. Circ. Revives Recor's PTAB Challenge To Medtronic IP
The Federal Circuit on Thursday revived medical technology company Recor Medical's challenge to a Medtronic Ireland Manufacturing patent on a way to treat heart and renal failure, telling the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to once again review the fight.
-
March 27, 2025
Mercedes Scores USPTO Review Of PTAB Loss
The acting U.S. Patent and Trademark Office director wants a review of an administrative patent board ruling that rejected Mercedes-Benz's efforts to invalidate a processor patent issued over a decade ago to engineers at Intel and later assigned to a company that's asserting it against automakers and others.
-
March 27, 2025
Fitch Even Sues Ex-IP Client In Effort To End Malpractice Case
Fitch Even Tabin & Flannery LLP has launched a lawsuit asking an Illinois federal court to declare that the co-founder of a former client isn't the inventor behind a prenatal test patent, which the firm said would put a stop to a malpractice case against it in state court.
-
March 27, 2025
Oura Gets Samsung's Preemptive IP Strike Tossed, For Now
Samsung Electronics cannot yet seek a declaration that its Galaxy Ring brand of wearable, health-tracking devices does not infringe Oura Health's smart ring patents, a California federal judge ruled Thursday, saying Samsung hasn't shown the Finnish company is threatening to sue for infringement.
-
March 27, 2025
WordPerfect Software Co. Settles 'Alludo' TM Suit In Wash.
The company behind the 1990s word-processing application WordPerfect has settled a Washington-based education technology firm's lawsuit accusing it of stealing a trademarked name for a 2022 revamp, ending the case ahead of an early April trial date in Seattle federal court.
-
March 27, 2025
Pfizer Tops Pharma Tax Avoidance, Senate Dems Say
Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer had no taxable profits in its largest market, the U.S., after booking all its income in jurisdictions including Puerto Rico, Singapore and Ireland, according to a Senate Finance Committee report prepared by panel Democrats that was released Thursday.
-
March 27, 2025
Palo Alto Networks Dodges $100M Cybersecurity Patent Case
A California federal judge has found that Silicon Valley-based Palo Alto Networks Inc. didn't infringe a trio of cybersecurity patents, freeing the company from a lawsuit that had asked for at least $100 million.
-
March 27, 2025
Disney Seeks $5.7M Atty Fee Award After 'Moana' IP Trial Win
The Walt Disney Co. sought $5.7 million in attorney fees Tuesday after beating an animator's trade secret and copyright suit claiming it ripped off his Polynesian adventure story to create "Moana," arguing he engaged in bad-faith tactics like forging evidence, perjuring himself and improperly inflating purported damages.
-
March 27, 2025
Texas IP Attys Get $60K Sanction For Unauthorized Practice
A San Francisco federal magistrate judge has leveled more than $60,000 in personal sanctions against Texas intellectual property lawyer William Ramey III and two other attorneys from his high-volume patent firm, saying two of them practiced law without a California license in numerous cases to escape paying out-of-state admission fees of $328 per lawyer.
-
March 27, 2025
Fox Rothschild Brings On McCarter & English IP Ace In NJ
Fox Rothschild LLP grew its Princeton, New Jersey, office this week with the addition of an intellectual property partner from McCarter & English LLP specializing in patent prosecution for medical devices, technology-enabled hardware and more.
-
March 27, 2025
Life Sciences REIT Says Ex-Employee Stole Trade Secrets
Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc. filed suit against a former employee in Massachusetts federal court, alleging that he stole a trove of proprietary information as he was planning to leave the company.
Expert Analysis
-
7 Tips For Associates To Thrive In Hybrid Work Environments
Excerpt from Practical Guidance
As the vast majority of law firms have embraced some type of hybrid work policy, associates should consider a few strategies to get the most out of both their in-person and remote workdays, says James Argionis at Cozen O’Connor.
-
Series
Playing Beach Volleyball Makes Me A Better Lawyer
My commitment to beach volleyball has become integral to my performance as an attorney, with the sport continually reminding me that teamwork, perseverance, professionalism and stress management are essential to both undertakings, says Amy Drushal at Trenam.
-
Patent Prosecution Length Has Surprising Impact On Invalidity
Though practitioners might hypothesize that patents with longer prosecution histories are less likely to have inherent validity problems, a statistical analysis of over 89,000 patents involved in litigation suggests otherwise, say attorneys at Baker Botts.
-
Managing Anti-Corporate Juror Views Revealed By CEO Killing
After the shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson laid bare deep-seated anti-corporate sentiments among the public, companies in numerous industries will have to navigate the influence of related juror biases on litigation dynamics, say Jorge Monroy and Keith Pounds at IMS Legal Strategies.
-
Opinion
2 Errors Limit The Potential Influence Of AI Fair Use Case
The recent opinion in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence may have little predictive value for artificial intelligence litigation, because the decision failed to engage with an important line of case law on intermediate copying, and misapplied the concepts of commercial substitution and superseding use, says Brandon Butler at Jaszi Butler PLLC.
-
How Law Firms Can Counteract The Loneliness Epidemic
The legal industry is facing an urgent epidemic of loneliness, affecting lawyer well-being, productivity, retention and profitability, and law firm leaders should take concrete steps to encourage the development of genuine workplace connections, says Michelle Gomez at Littler and Gwen Mellor Romans at Herald Talent.
-
Patent Eligibility Insights From Fed. Circ.'s Drill Bit Ruling
The Federal Circuit's recent decision in US Synthetic Corp. v. ITC addresses critical issues in patent eligibility jurisprudence, especially regarding composition-of-matter claims and Section 101 challenges, says Daniel Yannuzzi at Sheppard Mullin.
-
5 Keys To Building Stronger Attorney-Client Relationships
Attorneys are often focused on being seen as the expert, but bonding with clients and prospects by sharing a few key personal details provides the basis for a caring, trusted and profoundly deeper business relationship, says Deb Feder at Feder Development.
-
What Reuters Ruling Means For AI Fair Use And Copyright
A Delaware federal court's recent decision in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence is not likely to have lasting effect in view of the avalanche of artificial intelligence decisions to come, but the court made two points that will resonate with copyright owners who are disputing technology companies' unlicensed use of copyright-protected materials to train generative AI models, says David Ben-Meir at Ben-Meir Law Group.
-
Evidence Rule May Expand Use Of Out-Of-Court Statements
A proposed amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(A) would broaden the definition of nonhearsay, reflects a more pragmatic approach to regulating the admissibility of out-of-court statements by declarant-witnesses, and could help level the playing field between prosecutors and criminal defendants, say attorneys at Hangley Aronchick.
-
Series
Racing Corvettes Makes Me A Better Lawyer
The skills I use when racing Corvettes have enhanced my legal practice in several ways, because driving, like practicing law, requires precision, awareness and a good set of brakes — complete with the wisdom to know how and when to use them, says Kat Mateo at Olshan Frome.
-
Opinion
Attorneys Must Act Now To Protect Judicial Independence
Given the Trump administration's recent moves threatening the independence of the judiciary, including efforts to impeach judges who ruled against executive actions, lawyers must protect the rule of law and resist attempts to dilute the judicial branch’s authority, says attorney Bhavleen Sabharwal.
-
The Math Of Cross-Examination: Less Is More, More Is Less
When conducting cross-examination at trial, attorneys should remember that “less is more, and more is less” — limiting both the scope of questioning and the length of each query in order to control the witness’s testimony and keep the factfinders’ attention, says Thomas Innes at the Defender Association of Philadelphia.
-
Rethinking 'No Comment' For Clients Facing Public Crises
“No comment” is no longer a cost-free or even a viable public communications strategy for companies in crisis, and counsel must tailor their guidance based on a variety of competing factors to help clients emerge successfully, says Robert Bowers at Moore & Van Allen.
-
9th Circ. Draws The Line On Software As A Derivative Work
The Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Oracle International v. Rimini Street clarifies the meaning of derivative work under the Copyright Act, and when a work based upon a preexisting item doesn't constitute a derivative, says John Poulos at Norton Rose.