Intellectual Property

  • March 24, 2025

    Trump Asks High Court To Halt Fed. Workers' Reinstatement

    The Trump administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to pause a California federal court order reinstating tens of thousands of probationary federal workers who were fired from six agencies, arguing the band of nonprofit groups that obtained the order have no standing to challenge the firings.

  • March 24, 2025

    Netlist Again Wins Samsung Patent Contract Suit On Retrial

    Netlist Inc. secured a repeat win Monday in a California federal court retrial of a breach of contract suit against Samsung Electronics Co., a verdict that itself carries no money judgment but bolsters the chipmaker's position on maintaining $421 million worth of patent infringement damages from separate trials.

  • March 24, 2025

    Dog Toy Maker Appeals Injunction In Jack Daniel's TM Dispute

    The maker of a poop-themed dog toy that mimics Jack Daniel's bottles is appealing a permanent injunction that an Arizona federal court entered after finding the company tarnished the whiskey-maker's brand by associating it with feces.

  • March 24, 2025

    Supreme Court Skips Fed. Circ. 1-Word Order Cases

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a pair of challenges to the Federal Circuit's use of one-word orders in patent cases.

  • March 24, 2025

    High Court Turns Down Case Over Amazon Patent Program

    The U.S. Supreme Court decided Monday not to hear an appeal of a Federal Circuit decision that found a company alleging patent infringement through Amazon's patent evaluation program must face a declaratory judgment suit in the accused infringer's home state.

  • March 24, 2025

    Supreme Court Won't Review Dismissal Of Koss' PTAB Appeal

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned down an appeal by headphone maker Koss Corp. arguing that the Federal Circuit wrongly dismissed its appeal of a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision by finding that the company's patents had been declared invalid in a separate case that settled.

  • March 21, 2025

    7th Circ.'s Sykes' Top Rulings Before Senior Judge Transition

    Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Diane Sykes of the Seventh Circuit has let her voice be heard on major issues that faced courts during her time at the top, writing important rulings that have advanced biometric privacy litigation, kept Wisconsin's mandatory bar membership intact and curbed a "copyright troll" from crowding dockets with questionable suits. 

  • March 21, 2025

    Netlist 'Invented' Samsung Breach For Patent Grab, Jury Told

    A lawyer for Samsung Electronics Co. closed out the third trial in contract litigation with Netlist Inc. on Friday by telling a California federal jury that the chipmaker has "invented" a nonexistent breach because it wants to claw back valuable patent licenses.

  • March 21, 2025

    Comcast, Touchstream End $525M IP Suit With Midtrial Deal

    Comcast and New York startup Touchstream Technologies Inc. said Friday they have reached a settlement in Touchstream's $525 million infringement suit over video display patents. 

  • March 21, 2025

    Lululemon Secures PTAB Decision Axing Nike Shoe Patent

    Lululemon persuaded a panel of administrative judges on Friday to wipe out all of the claims in a Nike footwear manufacturing patent, which Nike had already dropped from its New York suit against the athletic apparel retailer by the time that case went to trial earlier this month.

  • March 21, 2025

    Judge Incredulous At Defense Raised In OpenAI TM Fight

    A California federal judge doubted Friday certain defenses in OpenAI's trademark battle against a man who runs a website called "open.ai," telling the man's counsel repeatedly during a hearing it's "incredible" that he's claiming the court can't legally order him to transfer the domain if he doesn't own the mark.

  • March 21, 2025

    Novartis Urges Court To Make FDA Block Entresto Generic

    Novartis says the U.S. Food & Drug Administration has made a drug marketing exclusivity window "meaningless" and wants a D.C. federal judge to block a rival from selling a generic drug that would compete with its blockbuster heart medication Entresto.

  • March 21, 2025

    Fed. Circ. Revives Blood Pump Patent Suit Against J&J Unit

    The Federal Circuit on Friday reinstated a blood pump patent suit by a unit of Swedish medical device company Getinge AB against a Johnson & Johnson MedTech subsidiary, faulting a Massachusetts federal judge's claim construction that led the parties to stipulate that there was no infringement.

  • March 21, 2025

    BMW Gets PTAB To Knock Out Processor Patent

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has found that BMW was able to show that all the claims it challenged in a patent for processor technology as invalid as obvious.

  • March 21, 2025

    Gibson Gets Infringement Finding Plus $1 In Guitar TM Retrial

    A Texas federal jury on Friday found that a Florida-based guitar maker infringed Gibson Brands Inc.'s trademarks on shapes of some of its famous guitars like the Flying V and Explorer but handed Gibson $1 after finding that it delayed bringing its claims.

  • March 21, 2025

    PTAB Judges Told To Get Ready For Layoffs

    Administrative judges with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board should prepare themselves for layoffs, according to an email from Chief Administrative Patent Judge Scott Boalick that was shared with Law360.

  • March 21, 2025

    Crocs Defends News Release In Bid To Beat Defamation Suit

    Footwear maker Crocs Inc. told a Colorado federal judge Friday that a 2022 news release in which it said Crocs secured "a judgment of infringement" against a rival company was at least substantially true, contending that's enough to defeat the rival's summary judgment bid in a defamation suit.

  • March 21, 2025

    Cigna Wants Fees After Being Cleared In Payment IP Row

    Cigna has urged a Texas federal court to award it legal fees in a case where it was cleared of infringing a card payment patent, saying the patent owner was trying to get the court to rule that a Federal Circuit ruling on the same patent in another case was wrong. 

  • March 21, 2025

    Off The Bench: Celts Sold, Tennis 'Cartel,' DraftKings In Deep

    In this week's Off The Bench, two BigLaw titans help steer the record sale of a prestigious NBA franchise, tennis pros heap damning antitrust allegations on the sport's leadership, and DraftKings remains mired in a dispute over its use of baseball players' likenesses to promote their gambling offers.

  • March 21, 2025

    Football Player Hits NCAA With Latest Antitrust Eligibility Suit

    The NCAA is facing yet another antitrust challenge to its eligibility rules, this time from a college football player who says the organization unfairly denied him a waiver that would have allowed him to play at Rutgers University next season.

  • March 21, 2025

    4th Circ. Revives TM Fight Over 'Westmont' Retirement Homes

    A Virginia federal court incorrectly concluded that there could be no likelihood of confusion between two companies that operate retirement communities with the name "Westmont" because they are on opposite sides of the U.S., the Fourth Circuit said in remanding the case and ordering a more comprehensive analysis on potential consumer confusion.

  • March 21, 2025

    UK Litigation Roundup: Here's What You Missed In London

    This past week in London has seen a sub-postmaster sue the Post Office and Fujitsu, Russian insurer Ingosstrakh hit the Financial Times with a defamation claim, and Britvic-owned Robinsons Soft Drinks file a passing off claim against Aldi. Here, Law360 looks at these and other new claims in the U.K.

  • March 21, 2025

    Fed. Circ. Backs Actavis' $12M Patent Suit Cost Deduction

    Drugmaker Actavis can take a $12 million tax deduction for money it spent fending off lawsuits while securing approval to sell generic birth control and other drugs, the Federal Circuit ruled Friday, affirming the U.S. Court of Federal Claims' decision that the costs were deductible as ordinary business expenses.

  • March 20, 2025

    Gilstrap Won't Enhance $192M Verdict Against Samsung

    U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap decided Thursday that tripling a $192 million willful patent infringement verdict against Samsung "is not warranted," finalizing a judgment against the smartphone maker over wireless charging devices used with Galaxy phones.

  • March 20, 2025

    NJ Military Co. Says Ex-Director Took Trade Secrets To Rival

    A New Jersey company that produces lubricants for military artillery sued a former employee Wednesday, claiming he took the company's proprietary information and set up a rival company making a nearly identical product.

Expert Analysis

  • Opinion

    Congress Must Consider Accurate Data About Patent Thickets

    Author Photo

    If Congress revisits a controversial bill this year aimed at limiting the number of patents pharmaceutical manufacturers could assert, it must make sure to act based on accurate reports — such as a recent U.S. Patent and Trademark Office study that found no evidence of patent thicketing, says David Kappos at the Council for Innovation Promotion.

  • Lights, Camera, Ethics? TV Lawyers Tend To Set Bad Example

    Author Photo

    Though fictional movies and television shows portraying lawyers are fun to watch, Hollywood’s inaccurate depictions of legal ethics can desensitize attorneys to ethics violations and lead real-life clients to believe that good lawyers take a scorched-earth approach, says Nancy Rapoport at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

  • Opinion

    DOGE Should Address Inefficiency In The Patent Marketplace

    Author Photo

    Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency is well positioned to identify to Congress the necessary variability needed among individual patent rights, ensuring that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's current inefficiencies do not impede promising inventions from reaching the market, says John Powers at Powers IP.

  • Perspectives

    Accountant-Owned Law Firms Could Blur Ethical Lines

    Author Photo

    KPMG’s recent application to open a legal practice in Arizona represents the first overture by an accounting firm to take advantage of the state’s relaxed law firm ownership rules, but enforcing and supervising the practice of law by nonattorneys could prove particularly challenging, says Seth Laver at Goldberg Segalla.

  • AI Will Soon Transform The E-Discovery Industrial Complex

    Author Photo

    Todd Itami at Covington discusses how generative artificial intelligence will reshape the current e-discovery paradigm, replacing the blunt instrument of data handling with a laser scalpel of fully integrated enterprise solutions — after first making e-discovery processes technically and legally harder.

  • IP, Licensing, M&A Trends To Watch In Life Sciences This Year

    Author Photo

    2025 promises to continue an exciting trajectory for the life sciences industry, with major trends ranging from global harmonization of intellectual property to cross-border licensing activity and an increase of nontraditional financial participants in the mergers and acquisition space, say attorneys at Morgan Lewis.

  • When Innovation Overwhelms The Rule Of Law

    Author Photo

    In an era where technology is rapidly evolving and artificial intelligence is seemingly everywhere, it’s worth asking if the law — both substantive precedent and procedural rules — can keep up with the light speed of innovation, says Reuben Guttman at Guttman Buschner.

  • Drug Pricing Policy Trends To Expect In 2025 And Beyond

    Author Photo

    Though 2025 may bring more of the same in the realm of drug pricing policy, business as usual entails a sustained, high level of legal and policy developments across at least six major areas, say attorneys at Ropes & Gray.

  • Imagine The Possibilities Of Openly Autistic Lawyering

    Author Photo

    Andi Mazingo at Lumen Law, who was diagnosed with autism about midway through her career, discusses how the legal profession can create inclusive workplaces that empower openly autistic lawyers and enhance innovation, and how neurodivergent attorneys can navigate the challenges and opportunities that come with disclosing one’s diagnosis.

  • Opinion

    Courts Should Nix Conferencing Rule In 1 Discovery Scenario

    Author Photo

    Parties are generally required to meet and confer to resolve a discovery dispute before bringing a related motion, but courts should dispense with this conferencing requirement when a party fails to specify a time by which it will complete its production, says Tristan Ellis at Shanies Law.

  • Series

    Documentary Filmmaking Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Becoming a documentary filmmaker has allowed me to merge my legal expertise with my passion for storytelling, and has helped me to hone negotiation, critical thinking and problem-solving skills that are important to both endeavors, says Robert Darwell at Sheppard Mullin.

  • Litigation Funding Disclosure Debate: Strategy Considerations

    Author Photo

    In the ongoing debate over whether courts should require disclosure of litigation funding, funders and plaintiffs tend to argue against such mandates, but voluntarily disclosing limited details about a funding arrangement can actually confer certain benefits to plaintiffs in some scenarios, say Andrew Stulce and Marc Cavan at Longford Capital.

  • FDA's Red No. 3 Ban Reshapes Food Safety Legal Landscape

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's recent ban on Red No. 3 represents more than the end of a controversial dye — it signals a shift in regulatory priorities, consumer expectations, intellectual property strategy, compliance considerations and litigation risk, says Dino Haloulos at Foley Mansfield.

  • Series

    Adventure Photography Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Photographing nature everywhere from Siberia to Cuba and Iceland to Rwanda provides me with a constant reminder to refresh, refocus and rethink the legal issues that my clients face, says Richard Birmingham at Davis Wright.

  • Fed. Circ. Inherency Ruling Refines Obviousness Framework

    Author Photo

    The Federal Circuit's December decision in Cytiva v. JSR has definitively eliminated the requirement of "reasonable expectation of success" analysis for inherent properties in obviousness determinations, while providing some key clarifications for patent practitioners, says Lawrence Kass at Steptoe.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Intellectual Property archive.
Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!