Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

  1. August 19, 2014

    Samsung Drops Bid For $2M Apple Bond Payment

    Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. dropped its bid Monday to force Apple Inc. to pay just over $2 million to cover costs Samsung incurred during a court-ordered injunction on sales of its Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet that was lifted after a jury ruled in 2012 that the device did not infringe an Apple patent.

  2. August 04, 2014

    Apple Says Samsung Should Pay $5.7M In Costs

    Apple Inc. has urged a California federal court to award it $5.7 million in costs in its long-running patent infringement battle with Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., arguing that both the clerk's taxation of costs and Samsung's argument on costs are insufficient.

  3. July 23, 2014

    Apple Defends $2M Award For Quinn Emanuel, Samsung Leak

    Firing back at efforts by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. to reduce $2 million in sanctions against them for disclosing confidential details of a patent license, Apple Inc. and Nokia Corp. said Tuesday that the order is appropriate for the misconduct.

  4. July 17, 2014

    Apple Says Samsung's IPhone Copycats Merit $16M Atty Fees

    Apple Inc. urged a California federal judge on Thursday to award it $15.7 million in attorneys' fees in its initial smartphone patent feud with Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., arguing that the award is justified by Samsung's willful production of copycat phones that infringed the iPhone's trade dress.

  5. July 08, 2014

    Quinn Emanuel, Samsung Blast $2M Penalty For Patent Leak

    Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. told a California federal court Monday that an order requiring them to pay $2 million in sanctions for disclosing confidential details of a patent license between Apple Inc. and Nokia Corp. to Samsung officials is "excessive" and must be reduced.

  6. June 23, 2014

    Quinn Emanuel, Samsung Sanctioned $2M For Patent Leak

    A California magistrate judge on Friday ordered Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and its client Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. to pay just more than $2 million as a sanction for disclosing confidential details of a smartphone patent license between Apple Inc. and Nokia Corp. to Samsung officials.

  7. June 11, 2014

    Samsung Wants Apple To Pay $2M For Dissolved Injunction

    Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. asked a judge Tuesday to order Apple Inc. to pay just over $2 million to cover costs Samsung incurred during a court-ordered injunction on sales of its Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet that was lifted after a jury ruled in 2012 that the device did not infringe an Apple patent.

  8. June 09, 2014

    Apple's Leaks Irrelevant To Quinn Sanctions, Judge Says

    A California federal judge refused Friday to force Apple Inc. to open a new round of discovery over how it handled its own secrets after the tech giant won sanctions against Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.'s firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP for leaking Apple's confidential patent license information.

  9. June 04, 2014

    Apple Says Octane Fitness Ruling Not Just For Patent Trolls

    Apple Inc. contended Tuesday that Samsung Electronics Co.'s argument that a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling only applied to so-called patent trolls was too narrow, arguing its smartphone patent foe should pick up part of the $60 million legal tab it paid Morrison & Foerster LLP, according to a brief filed in California federal court.

  10. May 14, 2014

    Apple Says High Court Ruling Boosts $16M Bid For Fees

    Apple Inc. told a California federal judge on Tuesday that the U.S. Supreme Court's Octane Fitness ruling last month relaxing the standards for fee-shifting in patent cases "strongly supports" its request for $16 million in attorneys' fees from Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. in their smartphone patent war.